Conformal transformation of the line element

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the transformation of the line element under conformal transformations, specifically using the Minkowski metric \( g_{ij} \) and the infinitesimal conformal transformation \( \delta x^{\mu} = a^{\mu} + \lambda x^{\mu} + \omega^{\mu}{}_{\nu}x^{\nu} + c^{\mu}x^{2} - 2 (c \cdot x) x^{\mu} \). The transformation is derived through the variation of the line element \( ds^{2} \), leading to the conclusion that \( \delta(ds^{2}) = 2\Lambda(x) ds^{2} \), where \( \Lambda(x) = \lambda - 2c \cdot x \). The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the local parameters and their derivatives in conformal geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski metric \( g_{ij} \)
  • Familiarity with conformal transformations in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of variational calculus and the Leibniz rule
  • Basic concepts of tensor calculus and partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Minkowski metric in detail
  • Explore advanced topics in conformal geometry and its applications
  • Learn about variational principles in physics and mathematics
  • Investigate the role of local parameters in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in differential geometry, and students studying general relativity or advanced calculus.

physicality
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Let us see how the line element transforms under conformal transformations. Consider the Minkovski metric gij, a line element ds2=dxigijdxj, and a conformal transformation

δk(x)=ak + λ xk + Λklxl + x2sk - 2xkx⋅s

We have δ(dxk)=dδ(x)k=λ dxk + Λkldxl + 2 x⋅dx sk - 2dxkx⋅s - 2xkdx⋅s

And so the line element transforms by δds2=δ(dxi)gijδ(dxj)=
(λ dxi + Λildxl + 2 x⋅dx si - 2dxix⋅s - 2xidx⋅s) gij (λ dxj + Λjrdxr + 2 x⋅dx sj - 2dxjx⋅s - 2xjdx⋅s)

How can we see that δds2=(2λ-2x⋅s)ds2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The variation symbol \delta is a derivation. So, you should consider

\delta \left(ds^{2}\right) = \eta_{\mu\nu} \ \delta \left(dx^{\mu}\right) \ dx^{\nu} + \eta_{\mu\nu} \ dx^{\mu} \ \delta \left(dx^{\nu}\right) . \ \ \ (1)

Now, for the infinitesimal conformal transformation

\delta x^{\mu} = a^{\mu} + \lambda x^{\mu} + \omega^{\mu}{}_{\nu}x^{\nu} + c^{\mu}x^{2} - 2 (c \cdot x ) x^{\mu} ,

if we take the partial derivative with respect to x^{\sigma}, we get

\partial_{\sigma} (\delta x^{\mu}) = \delta^{\mu}_{\sigma} \left( \lambda - 2 c \cdot x \right) + \eta_{\sigma \tau} \left( \omega^{\mu \tau} + 2 ( c^{\mu}x^{\tau} - c^{\tau}x^{\mu}) \right) . \ \ (2)

In terms of the following local parameters

\Lambda (x) = \lambda - 2 c \cdot x , \Omega^{\mu \tau}(x) = - \Omega^{\tau \mu}(x) = \omega^{\mu \tau} + 2 (c^{\mu}x^{\tau} - c^{\tau}x^{\mu}) , equation (2) becomes

\partial_{\sigma} (\delta x^{\mu}) = \delta^{\mu}_{\sigma} \ \Lambda (x) + \eta_{\sigma \tau} \ \Omega^{\mu \tau}(x) .

From this, you get

d (\delta x^{\mu}) = \Lambda (x) \ dx^{\mu} + \eta_{\sigma \tau} \ \Omega^{\mu \tau} \ dx^{\sigma} . \ \ \ \ \ (3)

Substituting (3) in (1), we find

\delta \left(ds^{2}\right) = 2 \Lambda (x) \ \eta_{\mu\nu} \ dx^{\mu} dx^{\nu} + \Omega_{\mu \nu}(x) \ dx^{\mu} dx^{\nu} + \Omega_{\nu \mu} (x) \ dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu} .

The last two terms vanish because \Omega_{\mu\nu} = - \Omega_{\nu\mu}. So you are left with

\delta \left(ds^{2}\right) = 2 \Lambda (x) \ ds^{2} .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Right, variations satisfy the Leibnitz rule. Thank you very much, sir.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 235 ·
8
Replies
235
Views
42K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K