Courses Confused about Future: Seeking Advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter deuce123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Future
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dilemma of pursuing a degree in chemical engineering versus physics, driven by financial concerns and a passion for physics. While chemical engineering offers better job security and higher earning potential, a physics degree may provide a more fulfilling educational experience and better preparation for graduate studies. Transitioning to a physics major could enhance opportunities for advanced degrees, but it may limit immediate job prospects compared to engineering. Pursuing a PhD in physics is challenging, especially with a chemical engineering background, and typically requires several years of low income during graduate studies. Ultimately, the choice involves weighing personal passion against financial stability and career opportunities.
deuce123
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I'm currently at war with myself. I'm pursuing chemical engineering as of now, mainly because of two reasons. The two reasons consisting of me wanting too have some knowledge in mathematics, physics, and chemistry. The other of course is money. Money because of me needing too support my family later on after I graduate. My family struggles to the point where we make it on a month to month basis, but always stressing about the future, and how we'll support ourselves. From that, I've always had a passion for physics, and wanting too even pursue my knowledge and hopefully get a phD someday. But I don't think its possible., since after graduation I'd have too just straight into work. I've been thinking and getting a masters degree in physics, and Chem eng. is possible after graduation, but I'd much rather pursue physics and get a Phd, but in my current position it seems highly unlikely, and almost impossible. If anyone can give me some advice I'd greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no easy, absolute correct solution here. There are just different options with advantages and disadvantages, but many of them can be made to work.

If you were to transfer into a physics major, you would probably get the education you want, but without the same kinds of professional options and opportunities when you graduate compared to a chemical engineer. You'll still have options and opportunities. Some people take the fact that engineers tend to have more options to mean that physics graduates have none, but on average physics graduates do tend to end up in well-paying jobs. For those without PhDs though, it's rare for them to be directly "doing" physics.

You would also be in a much better position to pursue graduate studies in physics if you study physics. It's likely going to be tough to enter a physics PhD or MSc program with a chemical engineering undergraduate degree - probably not impossible, but a lot harder than with a physics degree. A lot will depend on the courses that you take through your chemical engineering program. If you go to graduate school you'll be getting some money, probably not enough to support a family on though. Do that for 4-6 years, then you can make a little more money as a post-doctoral fellow for another few years, and only after that will you be eligible to compete for any tenure-track positions. The academic physics route is generally not advisable for someone who places a high priority on financial security and income.
 
  • Like
Likes vela
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
944
Back
Top