I'm teaching myself QM and have a question about a problem in my text. (If this makes it homework, sorry to post in the wrong forum).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Basically the question is about three observables A,B,C. They obey the following rules:

[A,B]=0, [A,C]=0, but [B,C] not equal to 0.

So this is like the situation with the total squared angular momentum L^2 and the axial angular momenta Lx, Ly, Lz. Now I know that if the observables commute, they "share a complete set of eigenstates." So in this situation you can have eigenstates of A that are also eigenstates of B or C, but not both at the same time [yes?]. So you can't have a single quantum state that is an eigenstate of all three [yes?]. Now the question asks about the effects of these relations on sequential measurements of the observables. If you start in an A eigenstate, and measure B or C, could the state be left unchanged since they both "contribute" eigenstates to A? If you start in B or C and measure the other, will you get an even spread across the available eigenstates since they don't commute?

Or, am I drifting hopelessly in Hilbert Space??

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Confused about Shared Eigenstates

Loading...

Similar Threads for Confused Shared Eigenstates | Date |
---|---|

I Spin confusion: Stern-Gerlach experiment | Jan 22, 2018 |

I Confused about Dirac Notation | Jan 13, 2018 |

B Two Confusing Entanglement Scenarios | Dec 20, 2017 |

I Probability vs radial density-confusion | Oct 25, 2017 |

I If operators commute then eigenstates are shared | Apr 5, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**