Confused about the electric field at the surface of a conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the electric field at the surface of a conductor, emphasizing that it has a normal component defined by the charge density (ρ) divided by the permittivity (ε). A point charge near the surface raises questions about the field's behavior, suggesting that the field approaches infinity as the distance decreases. However, it is clarified that the electric field is not infinite at an infinitesimal distance from the charge, as the charges within the conductor will respond to external fields, influencing the total field. The participants highlight the importance of understanding the nature of the charge (q) in the context of the conductor's charge density. Overall, the discussion seeks to reconcile the apparent contradiction between local field behavior and established principles regarding conductors.
parsa7parsa
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi
We know that the electric field at the surface of a conductor only have a normal component equal to ρ /ε (finite number).
But let’s consider the point P (at the surface of a conductor ) . Assume that there is a charge at an infinitesimal distance from the point p . we can obtain the field at the P by the fourmula (E=Kq/r) .obviously, E ~1/r. so the normal component of the field is infinite. Now if we add the field due to other charges, it will remain infinite. So where could I be possibly wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We know that the electric field at the surface of a conductor only have a normal component equal to ρ /ε (finite number).
It's the gradient of the electric field that has that value.

The charges in the conductor will respond to the electric field of the small charge close to the conductor - affecting the way the total field comes out. How do they respond?

Note - at a very small distance from a point charge, the field is not infinite.
If the charge is actually at point P, then it is part of the conductor. Inside a conductor, the charges are infinitesimally small (in this model).
 
parsa7parsa said:
we can obtain the field at the P by the fourmula (E=Kq/r)

You should ask yourself what exactly is "q" in that equation going to be for your capacitor with a given charge density (*cough*) ρ
 
please note that the charge is <within> the conductor
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top