B Confused by this: What does 10^10^79 mean?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Simon Peach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the mathematical expression 10^10^79, which represents 10 raised to the power of 10 raised to the power of 79. It is clarified that without parentheses, this expression is interpreted as 10^(10^79), indicating a one followed by 10^79 zeros. The conversation also touches on the ambiguity of exponentiation without clear notation and compares it to programming languages that have defined operator precedence. Additionally, the mention of Knuth's arrow notation highlights the complexity of expressing large numbers mathematically. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical notation to avoid confusion.
Simon Peach
Messages
80
Reaction score
17
I was reading a book on black holes by Kip Thorne the other day, well weeks really, and I came across this in one of the footnotes 10^10^79 (10 to the power of 10 to the power of 79) And I really don't know what it means. Does it just mean what it says? If it does can you raise a power to a power?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Simon Peach said:
I was reading a book on black holes by Kip Thorne the other day, well weeks really, and I came across this in one of the footnotes 10^10^79 (10 to the power of 10 to the power of 79) And I really don't know what it means. Does it just mean what it says? If it does can you raise a power to a power?
It is possible, although a bit sloppy, because ##2^{(3^2)} = 2^9 = 512 \neq (2^3)^2 = 8^2 = 64##, so there should better be brackets to avoid ambiguity. Without them, it probably means ##10^{10^{79}}=10^{(10^{79})}## a one with ##10^{79}## zeroes for otherwise one would have written ##10^{790}## instead.
 
fresh_42 said:
It is possible, although a bit sloppy, because ##2^{(3^2)} = 2^9 = 512 \neq (2^3)^2 = 8^2 = 64##, so there should better be brackets to avoid ambiguity. Without them, it probably means ##10^{10^{79}}=10^{(10^{79})}## a one with ##10^{79}## zeroes for otherwise one would have written ##10^{790}## instead.
Thanks fresh_42, I sort of thought that but it's good to have it confirmed by someone that knows a bit more maths than I do
 
With regard to operators, maybe someday mathematicians will get their acts together as well as the people who design programming languages. All of the languages based on C have tables of precedence and associativity, which enables one to unequivocally state how some expression will be evaluated. Although C, C++, C#, and Java don't have an exponentiation operator, Python does have such an operator -- ** -- the same as Fortran uses.

The Python docs say that this operator associates right-to-left, which means that 2 ** 3 ** 3 is the same as if written as 2 ** (3 ** 3). Most of the other operators associate left-to-right. Using a more mathematical notation, this would be ##2^{3^{3}}##, which if evaluated using the Python rules would be the same as if written ##2^{(3^3)}##.

We have PEDMAS, (or BEDMAS/BODMAS, for those who can't distinguish between parentheses, braces, brackets, and angle brackets) which gives the relative precedence of the different categories, with parentheses at the highest level, but this convention doesn't also provide information about how an expression with more than two operands associates, or groups.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top