Confused in stat. mech.-thermo., inconsistant result

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Hello guys,
Long problem but I'll drastically shorten it. I've a diatomic ideal gas of N molecules (the 2 atoms are distinct). I must calculate the internal energy and the specific heat for high temperatures.
I've got the solution but if I solve it my way in the last step, I get a different result.

Homework Equations


Partition function of one molecule: ##Z_1\approx \frac{T}{\omicron}##. This expression is to be found in the solution for this exercise.
Thus, for N molecules, i.e. the whole system: ##Z_N\approx \left ( \frac{T}{\omicron} \right ) ^N## (according to me). These approximations are valid for ##T>>\omicron##.
The solution states that from ##Z_1##, we can calculate the mean energy per molecule as ##\overline{\varepsilon}=-\frac{\partial Z_1 }{\partial \beta}=kT##.

The Attempt at a Solution


My idea was to get the Helmholz free energy and then, from it, getting the internal energy.
I got ##A(\beta,N) \approx -\frac{N}{\beta} \ln \left ( \frac{1}{k\beta \omicron} \right )##.
Since ##U=\left ( \frac{\partial A}{\partial \beta} \right ) _{V,N}##, I got ##U \approx\frac{N}{\beta ^2}[1-\ln (k\beta \omicron)]##. As you can see:
1)My result for U is not extensive (so I'm fried).
2)Dividing my expression for U by N, I don't reach the expression for the average energy per molecule the solution provides.

I don't understand what I did wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind guys, I found out the mistake. I had to multiply A by beta before taking the derivative with respect to beta, in order to get the internal energy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top