Confused on this defective matrix problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Matrix
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Make matrix defective if possible and identify the values of alpha.

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 3\alpha &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; \alpha &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \alpha<br /> \end{bmatrix}

Skipping the boring stuff we obtain (\alpha-\lambda)^2(3\alpha-\lambda)=0 as the characteristic polynomial.

\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\alpha and \lambda_3=3\alpha
For lambda being alpha
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2\alpha &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}\Rightarrow \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; \frac{-1}{2\alpha} &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}\Rightarrow x_2\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{-1}{2\alpha}\\ <br /> 1\\ <br /> 0 <br /> \end{bmatrix}+x_3\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0\\ <br /> 0\\ <br /> 1<br /> \end{bmatrix}

For this lambda value, the matrix can't be defective? Not sure though.

For lambda being 3alpha
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; -2\alpha &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -2\alpha<br /> \end{bmatrix}\Rightarrow \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}\Rightarrow x_1\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1\\ <br /> 0\\ <br /> 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}

And for this one, alpha can be any value and the matrix will be defective.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A 3x3 matrix is defective it has fewer that 3 distinct, linearly independent eigenvectors. How many distinct, linearly independent eigenvectors does this matrix have?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top