Confusing index notation involving grad of w cross r

troytroy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



consider the position vector expressed in terms of its cartesian components, r=xiei. Let w=wjej be a fixed vector whose components wj are constants that do not depend on the xi, so that δwj/δxi = 0


Homework Equations



I am trying to evaluate ∇((wXr)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
troytroy said:

Homework Statement



consider the position vector expressed in terms of its cartesian components, r=xiei. Let w=wjej be a fixed vector whose components wj are constants that do not depend on the xi, so that δwj/δxi = 0


Homework Equations



I am trying to evaluate ∇((wXr)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


Hi troytroy, welcome to PF!:smile:

What have you tried and where are you stuck?
 
I am getting confused on where to begin when using index notation for these kind of problems
 
troytroy said:
I am getting confused on where to begin when using index notation for these kind of problems

Well, here you are being asked to calulate the gradient of some scalar function, so a good place to start would be to look up the expression for the gradient of a general scalar function f in index notation. What is that?

Next consider that in this case, the scalar function in question is the scalar product of of a vector with itself, (\mathbf{w}\times\mathbf{r})^2 (the norm-squared of a vector is usually written as ||\mathbf{v}||^2, but some authors will use more clumsy notation and just call it \mathbf{v}^2. Either way the norm-squared of a vector is given by the scalar product of a vector with itself). So, how do you express the scalar product of a vector with itself in index notation?

Finally, consider that the vector whose norm-square you are taking the gradient of is, in this case, the cross product of a vector with another vector, \mathbf{w}\times\mathbf{r}. How do you represent a cross product like this in index notation?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top