Confusion about bound surface current of a cube

AI Thread Summary
When the magnetization vector of a cube is aligned in the z direction, the bound surface current is not zero. While the z components do cancel, bound surface currents exist on the X-Y outer surfaces, creating circulation around the cube. This phenomenon is analogous to the surface currents found on a circular rod, despite the difference in shape. The discussion highlights the importance of considering all surfaces when analyzing bound surface currents. Understanding these currents is crucial for applications in magnetism and material science.
kevinlee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If the magnetization vector is in the z direction, is the bound surface current of a cube always 0, since z cross z is 0, and x and -x cancels and y and -y cancels out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There will be bound surface currents on the X-Y outer surfaces that circulate around the cube.
This is just like the surface currents on a circular rod. The shape is just different.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top