Confusion about EM Transmission coefficient - critical angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the transmission coefficient (T) and reflection coefficient (R) of electromagnetic waves, particularly in relation to total reflection. It is clarified that when R equals 1, indicating total reflection, T should indeed be 0, contradicting the notion that T could equal 2. The participants emphasize that T and R should be treated as field coefficients, which can be complex and account for phase changes. The correct relationship for energy conservation is presented as |T|^2 + |R|^2 = 1, reinforcing that the unsigned values of R should be used in calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and implications of these coefficients in electromagnetic theory.
ThiagoEMag
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The reflection coefficient (R) of an EM wave is, as far as I know, 1 if there is total reflection and -1 if there is total reflection AND the phase changes by 180º.

However, we also know that the transmission coefficient is given by T = R + 1 (or by its own formula, which should give the same result)

That seems to mean that if the R is one (total reflection), T would be two. How can that be possible? I have a situation in which I did the calculations and that's the result I got, but it doesn't make sense to me. Shouldn't T be always 0 when there is total reflection, or did I misunderstand its meaning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I know T + R = 1 and T = 1 – R where R is the unsigned magnitude of the reflection coefficient.

Positive and negative values of R are useful in determining whether the reflection is caused by an open or short or some other impedance value, but only the unsigned value of R should be added or subtracted from T.
 
I believe you get T=R+1 from the continuity of the fields at the boundary. If so this implies that both T and R in that equation are actually the fields coefficient, that is the fraction of the field amplitude plus the phase change that is being transmitted and reflected, respectively. Since T and R are the fields coefficients, they can be complex, that's why you said there are cases where R=-1, this corresponds to the phase of 180 degree. In other words, one cannot say too much about the conservation of energy if one stays with this equation.
In your notation, the equation for energy conservation should be ##|T|^2+|R|^2=1##, which is the equation Tom_K wrote above in a different notation.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top