Confusion about op-amp statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter scothoward
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Op-amp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the closed-loop gain of an operational amplifier (op-amp) is largely unaffected by its open-loop gain due to the presence of negative feedback. This feedback stabilizes the output, ensuring that variations in the open-loop gain do not significantly alter the circuit's performance. Even if the open-loop gain changes dramatically, the closed-loop gain remains consistent, allowing for precise control in circuit design. This insensitivity to open-loop gain is a key reason why op-amps are favored in feedback configurations. Ultimately, negative feedback enhances circuit stability and reliability, making it a fundamental principle in op-amp applications.
scothoward
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
In my text it says,

"As a result of the negative feedback, it can be shown that the closed-loop gain is almost insensitive to the open-loop gain A of the op amp. For this reason, op amps are used in circuits with feedback paths."

I am a bit confused on what it means by closed-loop gain is almost insensitive to the open-loop gain. Any thoughts?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would think it means that when one has a feedback path, the open loop gain no longer affects how the input and output are related. With the feedback path, you are not subjected to the enormous open loop gain of the op amp, so the circuit essentially become insensitive to open loop gain.
 
scothoward said:
In my text it says,

"As a result of the negative feedback, it can be shown that the closed-loop gain is almost insensitive to the open-loop gain A of the op amp. For this reason, op amps are used in circuits with feedback paths."

I am a bit confused on what it means by closed-loop gain is almost insensitive to the open-loop gain. Any thoughts?

Thanks

this is due to the fact that the input of the open-loop amplifier is very low, almost zero (this is the role of the high gain open-loop chain!). imagine this is not the case, in stationary conditions: then, the output will be so big to suppress the input signal, when reapplied to the input through the feedback path. this bring to instability, in disagree with assumption of stationariety. so, the open-loop amplifier practically doesn't affect total gain, which is fixed by the feedback net. all this is true in stationary conditions, when the feedback net is "more fast" than the amplifier in restoring a low-signal condition at the open-loop chain input.
 
scothoward said:
In my text it says,

"As a result of the negative feedback, it can be shown that the closed-loop gain is almost insensitive to the open-loop gain A of the op amp. For this reason, op amps are used in circuits with feedback paths."

I am a bit confused on what it means by closed-loop gain is almost insensitive to the open-loop gain. Any thoughts?

there need to be some caveats: the open-loop gain of the op-amp, is the gain of the op-amp itself. and they design the op-amp so that this gain is very, very large. apply a microvolt to teeny-weeny + and - input terminals, and you'll get 100000 microvolts coming out (assuming you powered this up correctly).

however, with negative feedback, if you have an inverting amp (a circuit with an op-amp and some resistors) with gain of -100 or a non-inverting amp of gain +100 or similar, if the op-amp gain (open-loop) inside the circuit could change from 100000 to 200000 and the gain of your circuit would increase from 100 to 100.0001 or something like that. you wouldn't know the difference.

when you have astronomical gains (as high input resistance) in the op-amp that you can count on, then the characteristics of the circuit with negative feedback depends only on the other parts, not the op-amp.

negative feedback is cool. unless you're a psychologist, then they turn it around. what we engineers call "negative feedback", they call "positive feedback" because they make a value judgement that stability is a "positive" thing. what we call "positive feedback", they call "negative" because of the same value judgement. psychologists don't know squat.
 
You guys are making this way too complicated.

In the basic negative-feedback configuration, you have two gains: forward gain, a, and the feedback factor, f. The forward gain is what you would call the "open loop" gain.

The transfer function of this topology is:

\frac{ V_{out} }{ V_{in} } = \frac{ a } { 1 + af } = \frac{ 1 } { 1/a + f }

To see the effect of negative feedback, just assume f is some reasonable value, say, f = 0.5.

Now, consider what happens when you change a, the open-loop gain. If a = 100, you get a closed-loop gain of:

\frac{ V_{out} }{ V_{in} } = \frac{ 1 } { 1/100 + 0.5 } = 1.96078

If a = 1000, you get a closed-loop gain of:

\frac{ V_{out} }{ V_{in} } = \frac{ 1 } { 1/1000 + 0.5 } = 1.996007

That's what they mean when they say the closed-loop gain is insensitive to the open-loop gain. In fact, that's why we use negative feedback in circuits: you want your circuit to deliver a precise gain for the customer, regardless of the myriad manufacturing errors that can easily change the open-loop gain by a factor of 10 from one part to another.

- Warren
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top