Confusion about springs and hooke's law

AI Thread Summary
To stretch a spring, work must be done by applying equal and opposite forces to both ends, with one end held stationary. Hooke's Law, represented by F=kx, applies to the displacement of the spring from its unstressed length, where x is the relative displacement between the ends. If only one end is pulled, the spring accelerates unless the other end is fixed, resulting in zero net force. The restoring force generated by the spring acts at both ends, ensuring that the force exerted on the stationary end equals the negative of the force applied to the moving end. Understanding this relationship clarifies how work is done on the spring during stretching.
ehabmozart
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
There is a statement in my book i can't really understand. "To stretch a spring, we must do work. We apply equal and opposite forces to the ends of a spring and gradually increase the forces. We hold the left end stationary, so the force we apply at this end does no work.The force at the moving end does do work" ... How is it we apply force on both ends of a spring. Doesn't hook's law apply for the end we actually stretch. F=kx? Kindly Clarify.. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you apply force to only one end of the spring, the entire spring will simply accelerate. F=ma still works. If you want to stretch or compress the spring, something or someone must hold the other end of the spring stationary. In other words, the net force on the spring needs to be zero.
 
But then if it is stationary, how does the spring produce a force on the wall = -Fx??
 
Because x is not just displacement of an end point. It's displacement relative to the other end of the spring. If you displace one end by x, it's the same as displacing the other end by -x in terms of Hooke's Law.
 
Think of the x in Hooke's law as the amount by which the spring is stretched (from its unstretched length). As K^2 explains, the restoring force is exerted at both ends of the spring.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top