Confusion - Diff Eq for a Circuit? What does my professor mean?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving a differential equation for current in a series circuit with a battery, resistor, and inductor. The confusion stems from the notation "iR" for resistance, which is interpreted as current multiplied by resistance, leading to questions about its meaning. The user derives a differential equation and integrates it, resulting in an expression for current, but struggles with the implications of initial conditions where both i(0) and i(t=0) equal zero. This raises concerns about the constant C in the solution, as it suggests that the only solution may be zero. Ultimately, the user finds clarity when realizing the correct form of the equation, leading to a better understanding of the problem.
twotaileddemon
Messages
258
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My professor wants us to derive a differential equation for the current in a circuit.

The circuit has a battery with voltage E, resistor with resistance (iR)??, and inductance L. It's in series.


The Attempt at a Solution



What REALLY confuses me are these things:

Why iR instead of R? Is the i supposed to represent current? Then why is it given for the resistance and not inductance? I don't think it could be a complex number.. it just wouldn't make sense.

Anyway, I assumed she meant R instead of iR. Then I set up a diff eq like this:

i(t)*R + L(d/dt)i(t) = 0
after a bit of math, I got
d(i(t))/i(t) = -(R/L)dt
and integrating some more math...
i(t) = Cexp(-(R/L)t) where C is some constant.
okay, that's fine. It seems to make sense to me

But then she wants us to solve it if i(0) = 0 and i(t=0) = 0.

First of all.. isn't she saying the exact same thing twice? i(0) = i(t=0) I'm guessing?
And second of all... according to my equation, i(0) = Cexp(0) = 0 implies C = 0, or that the whole expression is 0. How do I solve the differential equation if C = 0 exactly? Or does it only have a solution of 0?

Any clarification could help. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't it be

E = i(t)R+ Ldi/dt
 
ah, okay. that makes more sense. I should be able to figure something out - thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top