Confusion regarding Solar Eclipse

AI Thread Summary
The timing of a solar eclipse is based on observations from Earth, specifically the moment of "first contact" when the moon begins to cover the sun. The speed of light, which takes about 8 minutes and 20 seconds to reach Earth from the sun, does not affect the perceived timing of the eclipse for observers on the ground. Although the moon's movement takes approximately 1.33 seconds to cover the sun, this does not change the observed time of the eclipse. Therefore, observers will see the covering of the sun at the designated time without any delays caused by the speed of light. Understanding these factors clarifies the timing of solar eclipses as experienced on Earth.
Sanket Jayn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If solar eclipse occurs at 12h 12m 12s actually. Then at what time one will see it on earth. Will the speed of light affect the time if moon starts covering sun at 12 h 12 m 12s when one will see covering on earth? at what time? I just want to know I am just curious do you think the time taken by sunlight 9 minutes will affect or time taken by moon 1.33 seconds wil affect or none of them, means we will see the covering at same time.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The time given for a solar eclipse is the time at which we observe it on the Earth. Let's suppose the time you gave (12h 12m 12s) is the time of "first contact", where the moon just begins to block the sun. If you wanted to know the location of the moon and the sun in a frame centered on the Earth at that instant, you would indeed need to take into account the finite speed of light. But this would not affect what you see on the Earth.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top