Confusion with how to calculate acceleration in this problem

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the average net force required to stop a 1500kg car from 27.8m/s over 55m, the correct approach involves using the formula v^2 = vo^2 + 2ad to find constant acceleration. The initial attempt to determine time by dividing distance by speed is flawed because the car's speed decreases, meaning average velocity cannot be assumed constant. The discussion highlights that without constant acceleration, the average force calculation becomes more complex and less straightforward. Additionally, the average force concept is clarified as dependent on constant acceleration, which is necessary for applying the relevant equations correctly. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar physics problems accurately.
Frankenstein19
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What average net force is required to bring a 1500kg car to rest from a speed of 27.8m/s within a distance of 55m?

Homework Equations


v^2=vo^2+2ad
vf-vo/(time elapsed)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I know I need to calculate the acceleration first, so immediately I thought of taking the distance and dividing it by the speed in order to get time, doing that I got 1.92s.

Then when I put the velocity over that time to get the acceleration, I thought i would get the correct acceleration but no. I got -14.48 and the book says its -7. The book uses the formula v^2=vo^2+2ad

Now, my question is: Why doesn't t work my way. Please don't tell me, it's much easier if you use the v^2 formula because I still won't understand since my question is why doesn't the way I thought work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frankenstein19 said:
dividing it by the speed in order to get time
Ah ! but the speed is gradually decreasing all the way to zero !
 
So I can't just do vf-vi/(v/s)? I'd get 0-55m/(28.7m/s)
 
When you divide distance by time, You are getting the average velocity. it is the average distance that this person cuts over time. Also that time that you got through that method is just the time that this average (constant) velocity will take to pass this distance. In another way, that time assume that the velocity over this distance is constant (doesn't change). If there is no acceleration then you can use this method.However as BvU mentioned it is decreasing. You are not cutting the same distances over time. So as a result you can't get time through d/v.

Can you explain your equation above? (Vf-vi)/v/s?
 
Others have pointed out the error in your calculation. I would just like to add a couple of points.
Frankenstein19 said:
What average net force is required to bring a 1500kg car to rest from a speed of 27.8m/s within a distance of 55m?
Frankenstein19 said:
The book uses the formula v^2=vo^2+2ad
The question should have specified constant acceleration, and therefore a constant force, making the qualifier 'average' redundant.
Average force is defined as ##\frac{\Delta p}{\Delta t}=\frac{\int F.dt}{\int .dt}##, where p is momentum. This is consistent with average acceleration, ##\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}=\frac{\int a.dt}{\int .dt}##.
You need the acceleration to be constant in order to be able to apply ##v^2=v_o^2+2ad##.
With non-constant acceleration, we could slow the car to 1m/s in 0.5s (-53.6m/s2), then bring it to rest in 95.6s at a uniform acceleration of -0.01m/s2.
The average acceleration would be -27.8/(.5+95.6)=-0.29m/s2, much less than for constant acceleration.
Frankenstein19 said:
I know I need to calculate the acceleration first
That's one way, but it's not the only way. You could arrive at the same answer by considering energy. Again, this is only valid for constant force.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top