Conjugation of a permutation by a permutation in a permutation group

  • Thread starter Thread starter karnten07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Permutation
karnten07
Messages
206
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let n \geq1. Let <a1,...,as> \inSn be a cycle and let \sigma\inSn be arbitrary. Show that

\sigma\circ <a1,...,as> \circ\sigma^{-1} = <\sigma(a1),...,\sigma(as)> in Sn.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


As the title says, i believe this is a theorem regarding that the inverse permutation is the effect of a conjugation of a permutation by a permutation in a permutation group. Does anyone know a proof for this or where to find one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's pretty hard to read. It's usually better if you put adjacent things in one tag instead of several.
 
morphism said:
That's pretty hard to read. It's usually better if you put adjacent things in one tag instead of several.
<br /> <br /> Im sorry, here it is written in wikipedia simpler:<br /> <br /> One theorem regarding the inverse permutation is the effect of a conjugation of a permutation by a permutation in a permutation group. If we have a permutation Q=(i1 i2 … in) and a permutation P, then PQP−1 = (P(i1) P(i2) … P(in)).<br /> <br /> Please any help guys
 
Try it out with specific permutations and see if you can spot a general pattern.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top