Explaining Connected Component: Real Numbers, Rationals, & More

  • Thread starter rainwyz0706
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Component
In summary: Another way to do this is to assume there's a separation (X_1,X_2), and to show that X_1 must contain X_2 (and hence X_1=X_2=X). To do this, show that if X_2 contains a point in the boundary of X_1, then it must contain the rest of the boundary of X_1. Do this by showing that any point in the boundary of X_1 can be connected to any other point in the boundary of X_1 by a path in X_2 (use the lemma above). This will show that X_2 contains the whole boundary of X_1, and iterating this argument will show that X_2 must
  • #1
rainwyz0706
36
0
I'm not quite clear about this notion. Could anyone explain a little bit for me?
Here is the definition:
Let a be an arbitrary point in X . Then there exists a largest connected subset of X
containing a, i.e. a set Ca such that:
• a ∈ Ca and Ca is connected;
• for any connected subset S of X containing a, S ⊆ Ca .
We call such a set Ca the connected component of X containing a, or simply a connected
component of X .
I can see that the connected components of R, Q etc are the singletons.
What about X = {(x, y) ∈ R2 ; x not equal to y} with the topology induced from R2 ?
Btw, if the interior of a subset A of R is the empty set, what are the different possibilities? Obviously, A could be Q, C, R etc.
Your input is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ca is the largest/maximal connected subset containing a, meaning that if S contains a, and

S contains C, then S is not connected.

"I can see that the connected components of R, Q etc are the singletons. "

Q, as a subset of R, is totally disconnected, so that the singletons q_n are the components. Any larger (than {q_n}, for any n ) subset containing q_n is disconnected.

(R , Std. Metric Topology)is connected, so the maximal connected subset containing
R is R itself.

"What about X = {(x, y) ∈ R2 ; x not equal to y} with the topology induced from R2 ?."

Then check to see if X is disconnected: what is the closure of X1={(x,y) in R^2 : x>y}

union X2={(x,y) in R^2: x<y}?. X is disconnected if ClX1/\X2 is empty,

and so is X1/\ClX2 (/\ is intersection, Cl is closure).

In the use I know, components are closed, since , if a subset A is connected, so is its
closure.


"Btw, if the interior of a subset A of R is the empty set, what are the different possibilities? Obviously, A could be Q, C, R etc."

R does not have empty interior. The Baire Category theorem shows this.

Q has empty interior --the irrationals are dense in the reals.

The Cantor set has empty interior
!
 
  • #3
Thank you very much for your reply. I have a much clearer picture in my mind.
Just one more question, to find the connected component for X = {(z, w) ∈ C2 ; z not equal to w} with the topology induced from C2, we still need to check to see if X is disconnected right? But it's hard to find two open and disjoint sets whose union is X. Since z not equal to w only means that the real parts and the complex parts are not equal respectively. How do we treat it then? Again, I really appreciate all your input here.
 
  • #4
I can't see, right away, a straightforward way to show that [tex]X=\{(z,w)\in\mathbb{C}^2\mid z\ne w\}[/tex] can't be separated. However, it's not hard to see that it's path connected, implying that it's connected.

First notice that for any u,v,w in C, there's a path from u to v that avoids w (if this is not obvious, draw a picture). Use that to see that there's a path from (u,v) to (z,w) in X, for any choice of (u,v) and (z,w):

First, there's a path from (u,v) to (z,v) lying entirely in C x v which avoids (v,v), by the lemma above. Then, there's a path from (z,v) to (z,w) lying entirely in z x C which avoids (z,z) by the same reasoning. Concatenate the two and you've shown X is path connected, therefore connected.
 
  • #5


Sure, I'd be happy to explain a little more about connected components for you. The concept of connected components is a fundamental one in topology, which is a branch of mathematics that studies the properties of spaces and their relationships. In simple terms, a connected component is a subset of a space that is "connected" in some way. Let's break down the definition you provided to better understand it.

First, we have the term "connected subset." In topology, a subset of a space is considered connected if every point in the subset can be connected to every other point in the subset by a continuous path. This means that there are no breaks or gaps in the subset, and all points are "reachable" from each other.

Next, we have the concept of a "largest connected subset." This means that within a larger space, there may be multiple connected subsets, but there is one that is the largest and contains all the other connected subsets. This is important because it helps us identify distinct parts of a space that are connected in some way.

Now, let's look at the example you mentioned. In the real numbers, the connected components are the singletons, meaning each individual point is its own connected component. In the rational numbers, the same holds true since each rational number can be connected to all other rational numbers by a continuous path.

However, in the space X = {(x, y) ∈ R2 ; x not equal to y} with the induced topology from R2, the connected components are not singletons. In fact, the connected components in this space are the lines x = y, meaning that any points on the same line can be connected to each other by a continuous path, but points on different lines cannot be connected.

Finally, for the last part of your question, if the interior of a subset A of R is empty, then the possibilities for A are that it is either the empty set, or it is a set that contains only irrational numbers. This is because the interior of a set is defined as the largest open subset contained within that set, and if there are no open subsets contained within a set, then the set must be either empty or contain only irrational numbers, as you mentioned.

I hope this helps clarify the concept of connected components for you. If you have any other questions, please let me know.
 

1. What are real numbers?

Real numbers are numbers that can be found on the number line, including both positive and negative numbers, as well as zero. They include both rational and irrational numbers.

2. What are rationals?

Rationals are numbers that can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, where the denominator is not equal to zero. This includes both positive and negative fractions, as well as zero.

3. What are irrationals?

Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers. They include numbers such as pi and the square root of 2.

4. How are real numbers and rationals connected?

All rationals are real numbers, but not all real numbers are rationals. Rationals are a subset of real numbers, and they can be found on the number line along with other real numbers.

5. Can you provide an example of a number that is both rational and irrational?

No, a number cannot be both rational and irrational. A number is either a rational or an irrational, but not both. For example, pi is an irrational number, while 1/2 is a rational number.

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
989
Replies
5
Views
764
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
80
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top