Connection between the two definitions of entropy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the connection between two definitions of entropy: the thermodynamic definition given by the integral of heat over temperature, and the statistical mechanics definition involving the logarithm of the ratio of accessible microstates. Participants explore how these definitions relate, particularly focusing on the emergence of the logarithm and the conditions under which these definitions may be reconciled.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express doubt about formally connecting the Clausius and Boltzmann definitions of entropy, noting that the Boltzmann definition applies specifically to the microcanonical ensemble.
  • Others suggest that a connection can be made when considering systems in the canonical ensemble, which relates the number of states to thermodynamic entropy.
  • One participant highlights the integral form of the thermodynamic definition and its relationship to the logarithmic form of the Boltzmann definition, questioning the simplicity of this connection.
  • Another participant discusses the role of the number of accessible microstates (W) in relation to changes in internal energy due to heating, suggesting that as temperature increases, more states become available, leading to increased entropy.
  • There is mention of the partition function in the canonical ensemble and its relation to entropy, with a detailed mathematical derivation provided by one participant.
  • Some participants recommend specific texts and resources for further understanding, indicating a need for mathematical rigor in the discussion.
  • A later reply introduces the idea that the equivalence of the two definitions may suggest a quantization procedure, contrasting the continuous nature of the Clausius definition with the discrete nature of the Boltzmann definition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the connection between the two definitions of entropy. While some believe a connection exists through the canonical ensemble, others maintain that the Boltzmann definition is limited to the microcanonical ensemble, leaving the discussion unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion may depend on specific assumptions about the ensembles and the definitions of entropy, and that the mathematical steps involved in the derivations are crucial for understanding the connections being explored.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
Hi All,

I would like to know how can one connect the two definitions of entropy
##\Delta S = \int_{T_i}^{T_f} \frac{dQ}{T} ## and ##\Delta S = k_B \ln (\frac{W_f}{W_i})##,
particularly I am interested in how the logarithm emerges. Does it have to do with some linear dependence of the heat with T?
DaTario
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Science news on Phys.org
DaTario said:
Summary:: Hi All, I would like to know how can we connect the two definitions of entropy
##\Delta S = \int_{T_i}^{T_f} \frac{dQ}{T} ## and ##\Delta S = k_B \ln (\frac{W_f}{W_i})##
I have severe doubts that one can formally connect the Clausius entropy equation to the Boltzmann entropy equation, as the Boltzmann entropy equation actually holds only for systems in the so called microcanonical ensemble.

EDIT: An association between the Clausius entropy and the results form statistical phyiscs can be found when considering systems in the so called canonical ensemble.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
As in above replies, the canonical ensemble provides the connection you need between the number of states ##W## and the thermodynamic entropy ##\int \frac{dQ}{T}##. My personal favorite introduction to the subject is Schrödinger's book "Statistical Thermophysics". It's cheap (<$10) and short.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaTario
Baluncore said:
It is quite interesting that thermodynamics definition has an integral with ##T^{-1}## inside and the Boltzmann entropy has a logarithm. I guess the connection is not likely to be so simple. If ##dQ## is always proportional to ##dT##, then the integral yields a log function. But what is the countable physical parameter in ##\int dQ/T##?

Perhaps, an explanation restricted to the case of a 1 mol sample of ideal gas would be a very good start.
 
Last edited:
DaTario said:
But what is the countable physical parameter in ∫dQ/T?
dQ is the change in the internal energy of the system due to heating. As the energy of the system is increased, the molecules can begin to occupy higher energy states. For example, as you raise the temperature a gas, you will find more molecules in high velocity states than before. Since more states become available (W increases, per Boltzmann definition), the entropy increases. To answer your question, the countable parameter is still W, the number of accessible microstates.

DaTario said:
Perhaps, an explanation restricted to the case of a 1 mol sample of ideal gas would be a very good start.
The canonical ensemble says that the probability of finding the gas in a microstate with energy E is proportional to ##e^{-E/kT}##. Since ##p(E) \propto e^{-E/kT}## and we know that probabilities have to sum to 1 (##\int p(E) = 1##), we know that ##p(E) = \frac{1}{Z} e^{-E/kT}## where ##Z = \int e^{-E/kT}##. For a single gas particle, we know the kinetic energy is ##\frac{1}{2} m v^2##, so $$Z = \int d^3 x \int d^3 v e^{-mv^2 / 2kT} = V\int d^3 v e^{-mv^2 / 2kT}$$ If you evaluate this integral, it gives ##Z = \frac{V}{\lambda^3}## where the constant ##\lambda = \sqrt{\frac{m}{2\pi kT}}## is the de Broglie wavelength of that particle. To get the partition function for N particles, take ##Z_N = Z^N = \left( \frac{V}{\lambda^3} \right) ^N##. Using some trickery from the canonical ensemble, we have $$S = \frac{\partial}{\partial T} (kT \ln Z_N) = k \ln Z_N + kT \frac{\partial \ln Z_N}{\partial T}$$ Since internal energy is given by ##U = -\frac{\partial }{\partial \beta} \ln Z_N = \frac{3}{2} NkT## and since ##\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} = -kT^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial T}##, we have that $$S = k \ln Z_N + \frac{U}{T} = kN \left[\ln \left( \frac{V}{\lambda^3} \right) + \frac{3}{2} \right] \approx kN \ln \left( \frac{V}{\lambda^3} \right) $$

Notice that this last term is essentially the number of de Broglie wavelength-sized cubes you could stuff into a volume V, and this is essentially a number of microstates.

Note: all the ensembles have slight differences in the additive constant on the entropy. I forget which is the most accurate, but I would trust the Sackur-Tetrode equation (from the microcanonical ensemble).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaTario and Delta2
anuttarasammyak said:
I think you had better read good texts to learn because we need some lines of mathematics.
Sorry! In case you need some lines of mathematics, please read section 1-4 "Canonical ensemble and thermodynamics" in Terrell L. Hill's book "An Introduction to Statistcal Thermodynamics".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaTario
Thank you all. Special thanks to Twigg for these lines of mathematics. Reading all these comments, it came into my mind that the equivalence of these two definitions in a certain sense seems to point to a quantization procedure as Clausius definition is continuous in principle whereas Boltzmann is discrete.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg
  • #10
DaTario said:
it came into my mind that the equivalence of these two definitions in a certain sense seems to point to a quantization procedure
That procedure is the microcanonical ensemble
 
  • #11
Twigg said:
As in above replies, the canonical ensemble provides the connection you need between the number of states ##W## and the thermodynamic entropy ##\int \frac{dQ}{T}##. My personal favorite introduction to the subject is Schrödinger's book "Statistical Thermophysics". It's cheap (<$10) and short.
Shame on me, when I was searching for it at Amazon's site and I saw its cover, I realized that I had it in my book shelf. Thank you for the indication anyway.
 
  • #12
I don't have it on me, but IIRC it doesn't cover the microcanonical ensemble. For that, you probably want a video lecture, because some of the geometrical arguments don't make sense without pictures (at least not to my pea brain).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaTario

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
773
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K