Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Consecutive integers such that the prime divisors of each is less or equal to 3

  1. Oct 6, 2012 #1
    For each integer n > 1, let p(n) denote the largest prime factor of n. Determine all
    triples (x; y; z) of distinct positive integers satisfying
     x; y; z are in arithmetic progression,
     p(xyz) <= 3.

    So far I have come up with 22k + 1, 22k + 1 + 22k, and 22k + 2 other than the solutions 1,2,3, or 2,3,4 or 6,9,12. Is this sufficient?
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 7, 2012 #2
    If we restrict the discussion to the primitive solutions, the complete list will be (1,2,3), (2,3,4) and (2,9,16). You can exclude the rest by simple considerations modulo 3 and 8.
  4. Oct 7, 2012 #3
    Thank you for your answer, but can you be more specific? How can we prove that your solutions and my solutions are the only solutions?
  5. Oct 7, 2012 #4
    Your solutions are not the only solutions if we allow multiplying each primitive solutions by 3^a * 2^b as you did as you left out solutions such as 18, 27, 36.
  6. Oct 7, 2012 #5
    but how to exclude the rest by considerations mod 3 and 8? thank you.
  7. Oct 8, 2012 #6
    By a primitive solution, I mean a triple (a,b,c), where a, b and c have no common factor. In that sense, the list (1,2,3), (2,3,4), (2,9,16) is complete.

    To exclude the rest, you need to do some case by case analysis. One useful initial observation is that exactly one of the numbers is divisible by 3, as alternatives quickly lead to contradictions. Then the case (odd, odd, odd) should be trivial to deal with. Looking at (odd, even, odd), this has to be of the form (1, 2m, 3n) giving the equation 2m+1=3n+1. Here the RHS[itex]\equiv[/itex]2 or 4 (mod 8), so m<3, giving the solution (1,2,3). The case (even, odd, even) has to be of the form (2t,3n,2m). For m<3, we have (2,3,4). For m≥3, the last number is [itex]\equiv[/itex] 0 mod 8, the middle is [itex]\equiv[/itex]1 or 3 mod 8, so the first must be [itex]\equiv[/itex]2 or 6 mod 8, implying t=1, and n even. The resulting equation is 3n=2m-1+1 or (3c-1)(3c+1)=2m-1 where c=n/2 can only take the value 1, and we get (2,9,16), and we are done.
  8. Oct 9, 2012 #7
    Other soluion is (1,1,1) ? Is that an arithmetic progression? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_progression Never mind the problem asked for distinct numbers
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Consecutive integers such that the prime divisors of each is less or equal to 3