MHB Consecutive vertical and horizontal transformations of a function

pluto1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I am stuck on this question:
"If f(x)=(2^x)+1, give in simplest terms the formula for h(x), which is obtained from transforming f(x) by

a vertical stretch, scale factor 8 relative to y=0
a translation by vector (1,4)
a horizontal stretch, scale factor 1/2 relative to x=0"

This is what I understand from the question:

A vertical stretch by scale factor 8 means h(x)= 8 f(x)
A translation by vector (1,4) means h(x)= f(x-1) + 4
A horizontal stretch by scale factor 1/2 means h(x)= f(1/2x)
Where the horizontal shift is applied prior to the horizontal stretch.

This gives me

h(x)= 8 ((2^(1/2 x-1) + 1/2 x - 1))+ 4
h(x)= 2^(2x-2) + 16 x - 4

h(x)=4^(x+1)+16x-4 according to the solutions at the back of my textbook. I would really appreciate some help. Thank you so much in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In what order are you doing these transformations?
 
I applied the horizontal changes before the vertical changes, with the translation by -1 prior to the stretch by 1/2

I just tried the opposite with all the vertical changes first but that does not give me the correct solution either
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top