I Consequences of Rotating Objects C on Coil A Frequency

AAB1994
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
image.png
As per the above figure coil A is situated inside a magnetic field caused by small accelerating objects B which in turn are causing the larmor frequency in coil

Object C or train of objects C have quadruple movement and are rotating around the coil A giving out gravitational waves.

Objects C are rotating with the source of magnetic or em field ( or are cause of it)

In above situation:Would there be acceleration of particles in coil A if the frequency of gravitational waves given out by objects C is double of larmor frequency? (As per parallel propagation given in the paper no.1,2, and 3)If we assume objects C to be rotating clockwise then in which direction(E or F) would the particles at point N accelerate (paper no.4 also shows the generation of em waves by accelerated particles) and if we they accelerate in one direction could the energy be highest at center of the coil depending on the direction of the coil.And would the above answers differ if the objects C were also generating magnetic fields through their acceleration (as the source of larmor precession on Coil A)

Papers

1)http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/..._paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
2)http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1981ApJ...248..783P&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
3)https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9905054.pdf
4)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.00893.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
B can be seen as current loop
 
Anyone?
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Particle accleration under gravitational waves?
Replies
19
Views
3K
Sciama's Machian Origin of Inertia
Replies
5
Views
7K
Globular cluster luminosity function
Replies
3
Views
2K
Celestial mechanics with symplectic integrators
Replies
3
Views
2K
B How do I calculate electron acceleration by gravitational waves
Replies
12
Views
3K
Stargazing Facing difficulties with radio telescope measurements
Replies
1
Views
2K
Why Does a(tau) Not Equal af in This Orbital Migration Equation?
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Did the Transit of Venus Shape Modern Astronomy?
Replies
7
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top