Conservation law for any potential field?

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion on conservation laws related to a free particle in a time-dependent scalar potential, it was noted that energy and momentum are not conserved, but a symmetry in the Lagrangian allows for the rotation of velocity. This symmetry leads to the conservation of angular momentum, but only in the case of a central potential where both position and velocity are rotated. The conversation highlighted the misconception that velocity rotation alone could imply a conservation law, emphasizing that such transformations require corresponding changes in the coordinate system. The application of Noether's theorem was mentioned as a method to calculate conserved quantities, but the specific conserved quantity was not identified. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn was that without rotational symmetry in the potential, conservation laws cannot be established.
maline
Messages
436
Reaction score
69
Consider a free particle moving in a general time-dependent scalar potential. Energy & momentum are not conserved. However, there is a symmetry in the lagrangian: the velocity appears only as its square, so we can rotate it without affecting the value of L. What conservation law results from this symmetry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of angular momentum.
 
DaleSpam said:
Conservation of angular momentum.
No, that's in the case of a central potential, where the symmetry is a rotation of both the position & velocity. I am asking about a completely arbitrary potential, and noting that rotation of the velocity alone should still be a symmetry.
 
Hmm, that is a good point that I missed. You would still calculate the conserved quantity using Noether's theorem, but I don't know what it would be offhand.
 
Last edited:
One bump...
 
Isn't this just time reversal symmetry?
 
Jilang said:
Isn't this just time reversal symmetry?
No, I'm talking about rotating the velocity by a general angle in any direction. This should be a continuous symmetry.
 
You cannot just rotate the velocity without rotating the coordinate system itself. The transformations covered by Noether's theorem are of the form ##t \to t +ks## and ##\vec x \to \vec X(t,s,\vec x)##, not transformations of the velocities.

You can do more general canonical transformations in Hamiltonian mechanics, but based on the symmetries of the Lagrangian this is not the case. In order to have a symmetry of the Lagrangian you therefore need to have rotational symmetry of the potential as well, resulting in conservation of angular momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes maline

Similar threads

Back
Top