I Conservation laws during particle decay?

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
I believe that conservation laws, like for energy and momentum, are obeyed during the particle decay process, e.g. the total energy of the new output particles is equal to the energy of the one input particle. But is that relationship subject to quantum fuzziness? Suppose we, somehow, prepare a coherent source of freely traveling massive particles. Then after some time, these particles each decay into two other particles. Is this decay process a quantum measurement event - does the wave function of the input particle collapse so that we are dealing with actual precise values of say energy when that energy is transferred to the two output particles?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
Is this decay process a quantum measurement event - does the wave function of the input particle collapse so that we are dealing with actual precise values of say energy when that energy is transferred to the two output particles?

The decay is only a measurement in the limited case as we learn something about the byproducts. When a neutron ejects an electron, you know you have a proton and a neutrino running around somewhere. That much is certain. Values for other properties do not collapse or otherwise take on well-defined values. So without knowing the initial momentum precisely, the child particles will not suddenly have certain values for momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
DrChinese said:
The decay is only a measurement in the limited case as we learn something about the byproducts. When a neutron ejects an electron, you know you have a proton and a neutrino running around somewhere. That much is certain. Values for other properties do not collapse or otherwise take on well-defined values. So without knowing the initial momentum precisely, the child particles will not suddenly have certain values for momentum.
Ok, thanks.

I guess I have a followup question: Suppose we know the initial momentum precisely. Is the conservation equation Momentum_in = Momentum_out obeyed precisely or is it subject to inherent quantum fuzziness do to the HUP, etc.?
 
referframe said:
Ok, thanks.

I guess I have a followup question: Suppose we know the initial momentum precisely. Is the conservation equation Momentum_in = Momentum_out obeyed precisely or is it subject to inherent quantum fuzziness do to the HUP, etc.?

I would say precisely. (In the sense that you measure both.)

If you knew Momentum_In precisely, and measured a child's Momentum precisely, you would also know the other child's Momentum precisely. And you could confirm that by experiment.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top