Conservation laws in rotational movement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration and angular speed of a uniform rod pivoting from a vertical position. For part (a), the corrected angular acceleration is found to be 14.7 rad/s² after addressing a missing gravitational factor in the initial calculations. In part (b), the change in height is clarified as L/2, leading to a proper application of conservation of energy to find the angular speed. The importance of clear notation and unit consistency is emphasized throughout the conversation. The final calculations confirm the correct approach to solving the problem.
MPat
Messages
15
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a uniform rod of mass 12kg and length 1.0m. At it's end the rod is attached to a fixed, friction free pivot. Initially the rod is balanced vertically above the pivot and begins to fall (from rest) as shown in the diagram. Determine,
a) the angular acceleration of the rod as it passes through the horizontal at B. (rod is horizontal with left end at pivot point)
b) the angular speed of the rod as it passes through the vertical at C. (rod is vertical with upper end at pivot point)

For the diagram picture a clock with hand pointing to 12 (for position A, initial position), 3 for position B, 6 for position C.

Given:
m=12kg
L= 1.0m

Homework Equations


τ = Iα
PE = mgh
KE (rotational) = 1/2Iω^2
Irod = 1/3ml^2

The Attempt at a Solution


a) α=?
τ = Iα
τ = rF, F = mg, τ = rmg, r=L/2 since center of mass will be at centre of rod
τ=L/2*mg
Iα=1/3ml^
L/2*mg =1/3ml^
Solve for α
m cancels out
3L/2L^2 = α
L cancels out
3/2L=α
3/2(1)= α = 1.5 rad/s^2

b) ω=?
mgh=KE
mgL/2=1/2(1/3ML^2)ω^2
mass cancels out
6gL/2L^2 = ω^2
3g/2L = ω^2
ω= sqrt (3*9.8/2*1)
ω = 5.42 rad/s

I'm just not sure if I got the answer correct. Is someone able to check? Was a little unsure of what numbers I was using as radius and center of mass.

Thanks

Miral
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You lost a factor g somewhere in the calculation of the acceleration. This would have been obvious if you would have included the units, because the left side is a length and the right side is an angular acceleration - they cannot be equal.

How did you find h in (b)?Concerning the notation: Things like 1/2L are problematic: is it 1/(2L) or (1/2)L? Usually the latter - if the L is supposed to be in the denominator, you should write 1/(2L).
 
mfb said:
You lost a factor g somewhere in the calculation of the acceleration. This would have been obvious if you would have included the units, because the left side is a length and the right side is an angular acceleration - they cannot be equal.

How did you find h in (b)?Concerning the notation: Things like 1/2L are problematic: is it 1/(2L) or (1/2)L? Usually the latter - if the L is supposed to be in the denominator, you should write 1/(2L).
Whoops! You're totally right. I lost a g in there.

L/2*mg =1/3ml^
Solve for α
m cancels out
3Lg/2L^2 = α
L cancels out
(3g)/(2L)=α
3(9.8)/2(1)= α = 14.7 rad/s^2Found the h or change in h by taking half of the length of the rod. L=1.0m, H = L/2
If the rod is starting at position B with rod horizontal, gravity acts on the center of mass, the change in height from position B to C is therefore 0.5m or L/2.

Does that look better?
 
MPat said:
If the rod is starting at position B with rod horizontal
I don't think it is. I don't see the diagram, but the starting position should be "12" at the clock.

(a) looks better now.
 
mfb said:
I don't think it is. I don't see the diagram, but the starting position should be "12" at the clock.

(a) looks better now.
Ohhh...I think I see your point. If my starting point was B then the rod would have already gained some KE from A to B. So if I use conservation of energy and start at position A, the height would be 1.0m. mgh (point A) = KE (point C).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top