Conservation of Angluar Momentun question

  • Thread starter Thread starter ziptrickhead
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the conservation of angular momentum as a star transitions into a white dwarf. The initial calculations for the white dwarf's radius, based on the conservation of angular momentum, suggest a radius of approximately 6.99 million meters. However, the poster encounters an error when submitting this answer, indicating a potential miscalculation. A key point raised is that the mass ejected from the star must be considered, as it affects the effective radius of the remaining mass. The poster plans to seek clarification from their professor regarding the discrepancy in their calculations.
ziptrickhead
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When a star like our Sun no longer has any hydrogen or helium "fuel" for thermonuclear reactions in its core, it can collapse and become a white dwarf star. Often the star will "blow off" its outer layers and lose some mass before it collapses into the rapidly spinning, dense white dwarf. Suppose a star with mass 1.0 Msun , with a radius of 6.96×108 and rotating once every 25 days, becomes a white dwarf with a mass of 0.60 Msun and a rotation period of 131s.

What is the radius of this white dwarf? (You may assume the progenitor star and the white dwarf star are both spherical.)

Homework Equations



I'm assuming that there are no external torques so it's angular momentum is conserved.

So,
I1\omega1=I2\omega2

rotational inertia of a solid sphere I=(2/5)mr2

\omega1=2.91*10-6 rad/s (from 1 rotation every 25 days)
\omega2=0.04796 rad/s (from rotation period of 131s)

The Attempt at a Solution



After rearranging the angular momentum equation from above:

r22=(m1r12\omega1)/(m2\omega2)

r22=[(1.0 Msun)(6.96*108)2(2.91*10-6)]/[(0.6 Msun)(0.04796)]

so r2=6.99*106m
The problem I'm having is that when I try to enter in this answer into masteringphysics it tells me I'm wrong. I've checked over my work a few times but I can't see my error anywhere.

EDIT:
Looks like the same problem was posted here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=255031

I guess I'll just have to confirm with the professor tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
no ... 0.4 solar mass was ejected , carrying off *their* portion of angular momentum.

so ... if that came from the outer Sun shell, its retained (effective) radius started at only
cuberoot(0.6) of what you were using.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top