Conservation of angular momentum and spin

AI Thread Summary
Spin angular momentum is considered as real as bulk angular momentum, meaning that flipping the spin of electrons in an object should cause the object to spin in the opposite direction to conserve angular momentum. When a permanent magnet is aligned with an external magnetic field and then the polarity of that field is reversed, the magnet should indeed start to rotate. Heating the magnet past the Curie point may also lead to changes in its bulk rotation due to the coupling of individual electron spins to the overall rotation. The discussion highlights the Einstein-de Haas effect as a relevant phenomenon related to these principles. Understanding the right terminology is crucial for exploring these concepts further.
Khashishi
Science Advisor
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
490
My understanding is that spin angular momentum is just as real as bulk angular momentum. So, if we get the spin of some electrons in an object to flip, then the object should start spinning in the opposite direction to conserve angular momentum. Right?

If we mount a permanent magnet in an external magnetic field in such a way as to allow the magnet to rotate along the field direction, and allow the magnet to align with the external field, and let the magnet come to rest, then reverse the polarity of the external magnetic field. Then, the magnet should start turning, right?

Or, if we heat up the magnet past the Curie point, we should see some change in bulk rotation, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming individual electron spins are coupled to the bulk rotation of the whole magnet.
Certainly, to conserve angular momentum, flipping the spin of an electron does require something else to also flip.

In the experiment described, the action of the external field would be to align the magnetic moments of the susceptible components of the magnet. Having achieved that, releasing the magnet, then reversing the field, does, indeed, result in a rotation of the magnet. That's how you make a compass needle. But I don't think this is what you mean.

Do you have something specific in mind?
 
I mean, if we constrain the magnet to rotate only along the z axis. Then apply an external field strong enough to flip the poles of the magnet. Has this experiment been done already?
 
You mean if we get all the dipoles in the magnet aligned predominantly one way, and set the magnet to pivot only about that axis, then flip the dipoles?

I do not know if that has been attempted.
 
Ok, I found the answer. It's called the Einstein-de Haas effect.
What's with this Einstein guy. Frickin everywhere.
 
Last edited:
Oh well done! I was trawling for just that myself.
The trick is figuring out the right search term.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top