Conservation of Angular Momentum of a Disk

AI Thread Summary
A solid disk with an initial angular velocity of 0.094 rad/s and a moment of inertia of 0.12 kg·m² has sand dropped onto it, forming a ring at a distance of 0.48 m with a mass of 0.36 kg. The conservation of angular momentum principle is applied, where the initial angular momentum (L0) equals the final angular momentum (Lf). The moment of inertia of the sand ring is calculated as (0.36 kg)(0.48 m)², and it must be added to the disk's moment of inertia to find the total final inertia (If). The discussion concludes with the realization that a calculation error was the source of confusion, leading to the correct understanding of how to incorporate the disk's inertia.
shaka23h
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A solid disk rotates at an angular velocity of 0.094 rad/s with respect to an axis perpendicular to the disk at its center. The moment of inertia of the disk is 0.12 kg·m2. From above, sand is dropped straight down onto this rotating disk, so that a thin uniform ring of sand is formed at a distance 0.48 m from the axis. The sand in the ring has a mass of 0.36 kg. After all the sand is in place, what is the angular velocity of the disk?



I just have no clue why I'm not getting the correct answer on this problem.

Here are my steps

I know that since Momentum is convserved L0 = Lf or I0W0 IfWf

W = angular velocity

so I set (0.12 kg m ^2)(.094 rad/s) = (If)(Wf)


Since we were to treat the Inertia of it to be a hoop the equation of Inertia is I = MR ^2

So this is my final equation (0.12 kg m ^2)(.094 rad/s) = (If)(Wf)


I think where I'm going wrong is when I solved for Inertia (I) for If I used (.36 kg)(.48 ^2)


Please point out what I need to do to correct this problem

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sand increases the moment of intertia of the disk/sand system, but it does not replace the disk. It looks like you have not included the disk in your I_f.
 
ok am I suppose to include the inertia of the disc by adding the I0 to (.36 x .48 ^2).

I'm still not getting the answer


nvm I got it it was just an error in calculation.

you are awsome DOC :)

thx a lot
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top