Conservation of Angular Momentum of a Disk

AI Thread Summary
A solid disk with an initial angular velocity of 0.094 rad/s and a moment of inertia of 0.12 kg·m² has sand dropped onto it, forming a ring at a distance of 0.48 m with a mass of 0.36 kg. The conservation of angular momentum principle is applied, where the initial angular momentum (L0) equals the final angular momentum (Lf). The moment of inertia of the sand ring is calculated as (0.36 kg)(0.48 m)², and it must be added to the disk's moment of inertia to find the total final inertia (If). The discussion concludes with the realization that a calculation error was the source of confusion, leading to the correct understanding of how to incorporate the disk's inertia.
shaka23h
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A solid disk rotates at an angular velocity of 0.094 rad/s with respect to an axis perpendicular to the disk at its center. The moment of inertia of the disk is 0.12 kg·m2. From above, sand is dropped straight down onto this rotating disk, so that a thin uniform ring of sand is formed at a distance 0.48 m from the axis. The sand in the ring has a mass of 0.36 kg. After all the sand is in place, what is the angular velocity of the disk?



I just have no clue why I'm not getting the correct answer on this problem.

Here are my steps

I know that since Momentum is convserved L0 = Lf or I0W0 IfWf

W = angular velocity

so I set (0.12 kg m ^2)(.094 rad/s) = (If)(Wf)


Since we were to treat the Inertia of it to be a hoop the equation of Inertia is I = MR ^2

So this is my final equation (0.12 kg m ^2)(.094 rad/s) = (If)(Wf)


I think where I'm going wrong is when I solved for Inertia (I) for If I used (.36 kg)(.48 ^2)


Please point out what I need to do to correct this problem

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sand increases the moment of intertia of the disk/sand system, but it does not replace the disk. It looks like you have not included the disk in your I_f.
 
ok am I suppose to include the inertia of the disc by adding the I0 to (.36 x .48 ^2).

I'm still not getting the answer


nvm I got it it was just an error in calculation.

you are awsome DOC :)

thx a lot
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top