Conservation of Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
Total mechanical energy conservation does not guarantee angular momentum conservation, as angular momentum depends on mass, radius, and velocity. In a closed system with only internal forces, angular momentum is conserved, but external forces can disrupt this. For example, a skateboarder on a frictionless half-pipe experiences changes in momentum and direction, indicating that angular momentum is not conserved in this scenario. Including external objects like Earth can restore conservation by compensating for changes in momentum. Ultimately, conservation laws for linear momentum, angular momentum, and energy apply only in closed systems without external influences.
airbauer33
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If total Mechanical Energy is conserved, can you say that angular momentum is also conserved?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but with the caution that for Angular Momentum one must conserve not just the speed of the moment but the other factors as well, to wit mass and radius.

It's the reason that when a spinning skater brings their arms close to their body they spin faster, and when they want to exit the spin they move their arms out wide to lower their angular momentum to where they can capture the remainder in movement and skate to ice losses instead of just moving with their arms in close and falling over.
 
That depends what you're considering part of your system. If you include enough objects that all forces are internal to your system, then the angular momentum of the system as a whole will be conserved, even if the mechanical energy isn't. However, if there are external forces acting on an object (even conservative ones) the object's angular (and linear) momentum need not be conserved.

Consider, for example, a skateboarder going back and forth on a frictionless half-pipe. Here, mechanical energy must be conserved, since the only forces are gravity and the normal force. However, the skateboarder's momentum will certainly not be conserved (either magnitude or direction). Now, that being the case, it's not too hard to see that angular momentum can't be conserved either. Since the skateboarder reverses direction, the angular momentum must also change direction. And, since this happens smoothly, angular momentum will vary continuously.

Now, if we were to include Earth as part of our system, the changes in its momentum and angular momentum would compensate for those of the skateboarder, leaving these both conserved (well, at least if we neglect the Earth's orbital motion).
 
In the case of the half pipe, wouldn't the angular momentum be converted into potential energy and possibly linear momentum if the sides of the half pipe are vertical for some fixed (non-zero) distance?
 
Yes. A better way of looking at this is that angular/linear kinetic energy are converted to potential energy. Since the forces involved are conservative, total energy (kinetic plus potential) is conserved.

All three quantities subject to conservation laws (linear momentum, angular momentum, and energy) are conserved in a closed system. Open the system up to external forces and one or more of these quantities may not be conserved.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top