Conservation of Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving the conservation of angular momentum in a system of three rotating disks connected by a string. The user seeks to determine the ratio of angular momentum between the largest and smallest disks, given their equal densities and thicknesses. The key equations mentioned include the angular momentum formula L = Iω and the relationship between tangential speed and angular speed for connected disks. There is a discrepancy in the answers provided by users, particularly regarding the influence of the hub radius on the ratio. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in physics forums.
murphy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have a physics problem that I think is not so hard but I just can't get the answer. There are two uniform circular disks that are rotating and attached by a string. there is no slip between the string and the disks. On the small disk is a hub that is attached like the first two to an even smaller disk by string. The radii are given for the three disks and the hub, and the smallest disk and largest disk have equal densities and thickness. I am asked to find the ratio between the magnitude of the angular momentum of the biggest disk to the angular momentum of the smallest disk. All the disks are spinning in the same direction. I added a picture of this but I'm not sure how exactly so it might not show. I appresciate any help I can get with this!
 

Attachments

  • Fig11_42.gif
    Fig11_42.gif
    4.4 KB · Views: 529
Physics news on Phys.org
I get

\frac {L_C}{L_B} = \frac {R_A R_C}{R_B^2}

on my first runthrough.
 
The angular momentum of each disk is L = I \omega. Disks connected by strings will have the same tangential speed (v = \omega R); use that fact to relate the angular speeds of the connected disks.

My answer differs from Tide's. (L_C/L_B will depend on the hub radius, for one thing.) But I think you can figure it out for yourself. (Why should Tide and I have all the fun? :smile: )
 
Al,

You're right - I mistyped my expression off my notepad but we'll let Murphy figure it out! :-)
 
Thanks! I love this forum!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top