Conservation of angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
Incident linearly polarized radiation can result in scattered radiation that is circularly or elliptically polarized, depending on the nature of the scatterer. In a lossless dielectric, the scattered radiation remains linearly polarized, while a conducting scatterer may allow for elliptical polarization. The conservation of angular momentum is a key consideration, as the material can gain or lose angular momentum during scattering. The intrinsic angular momentum of the photon and its position also contribute to the overall angular momentum in the system. Ultimately, the behavior of scattered radiation in relation to polarization and angular momentum conservation is complex and varies with the scattering medium.
rays
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
If the incident radiation is linearly polarized can the scattered radiation be circularly or elliptically polarized? If the scatter is a lossless dielectric the scattered radiation is not elliptically polarized. How about if the scatter is conducting? if the scattered radiation is elliptically polarized, does it violate the conservation of angular momentum?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scattering where?
In general, the material can get (or lose) angular momentum. In addition, angular momentum in some specific frame can come from the position of the photon itself (together with the velocity), its intrinsic angular momentum is just one component.
 
mfb,

Thank you for the quick reply!

In classical eletromagnetic theory, if the incident EM wave is linearly polarized (no angular momentum) and it is scattered by a fixed spherical perfect conductor, then can the scattered EM wave be elliptically polarized?

rays
 
I would expect this in the general case (at least for some scattering angles), but I don't know.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top