Conservation of Bayron number, Lepton number and strangeness

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation laws in particle physics, specifically baryon number, lepton number, and strangeness. These laws are considered fundamental properties of nature, which are intrinsic and lack deeper explanations. Baryons and leptons are classifications of fundamental particles, with baryon number being conserved during particle decay processes. An example is provided where neutron decay conserves baryon number, while certain combinations of particles do not, highlighting the importance of these conservation laws. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the underlying principles of particle interactions.
Yael
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

i'm stuck on my homework.. and this particle physics and cosmology chapter is killing me

a question asks me to discuss the following conservation laws: energy, linear momentum, angular momentum, electric charge (ok so far) AND bayron number, lepton number and strangeness.
are all of these laws based on fundamental properties of nature? Explain.

Now i do get the laws of conservation of bayron, lepton and strangeness...
but what do they mean exactly by fundamental properties?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fundamental properties of matter are those things that have no "why" beneath them. Mass is a property that matter has, so is charge. Turns out, as quantum was figured out, that there are more properties that just "are." "strangeness" is a property of matter. Its a strange property, hence its name. Don't worry about it now, it just "is."

Baryons and leptons are classifications for fundamental particles. There are many types of each, so "baryon-ness" is NOT a property. Energy and momentum are derived quantities.
 
Excuse me for responding so far, but I think this can be helpful for somebody who visit this page.I´m going to talk about the baryon number. For example, in a neutron decay we can get a proton+electron+antineutrino; this transformation doesn´t violate the energy and charge conservation laws, and so we can set a question, why can't we obtain from this decay the combination electron+positron+one or more neutrinos and antineutrinos if that laws aren´t also broken?
The answer to this question was answered by Ernest Stückelberg (or something like that) that introduced heavy charges (now known as the bayron quantum number) who said that that number must be conservated as well in all the possible combinations of a decay and not into the forbidden ones, so neutron and proton are assumed to have the value of 1 for this number, electron, positron and neutrino are related to the 0 and the antiparticles to the additive inverse of the particle number.
So we get:
electron (0) +proton (1) + antineutrino (0)= 1 (neutron's bayron number), so this result is allowed.
electron (0) + positron (0) + neutrinos or antineutrinos (0)= 0 (the baryon number isn´t conserved and the result is forbidden)
I hope you find it useful. (For more information I reccomend see the book: facts and mysteries in elementary particle physics, written by Martinus Veltman)
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top