Conservation of energy/Angular momentum for elastic collison

AI Thread Summary
A uniform thin rod of length L and mass M rotates freely about a pivot, while a ball of mass m on a string of length R is deflected and released. The problem involves finding R such that after an elastic collision, the ball remains at rest in the vertical position. The conservation of angular momentum and energy equations are applied, leading to the relationship mR² = (1/3)ML². The final expression for R is derived as R = √(1/3)(M/m)L, which incorporates the masses involved. This outcome is acceptable as it aligns with the problem's requirements.
Oliver Legote
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform thin rod of Length L and mass M can freely rotate about a point 0 and is at rest in at the vertical. A ball of mass m on a light string of length R, which is also attached about the pivot is deflected by a small angle from the vertical and let go of.

If the collision is totally elastic find the length of the string such that after the collision the ball remains at rest in the vertical

Homework Equations


Conservation of Angular momentum; I1ϖ1 = I2ϖ2
Conservation of Energy; U1+K1= U2+K2
Ek= 1/2 mv^2
GPE= MGH

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to find the GPE of the ball on the string at rest when it is deflected, using V=√(2gh) where H was defined as the change in the y-coordinate of the ball's center of mass: R(1-cosα) where I defined α as the small deflection that was not named.

I then tried to used the moment of inertia of a Rod passing through the end as (1/3) M L2.

As the collision is elastic Kinetic energy is conserved, however I cannot for the life of me get an equation in which I can isolate R in terms of L. I can't seem to find the angular speed of the rod after it is struck, which I feel is the way to go.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated, cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oliver Legote said:
V=√(2gh)
You do not need to worry about the starting height. Let the ball has some angular velocity ωi just before the collision.
Invent other variables as necessary.
What equations can you write?
 
haruspex said:
You do not need to worry about the starting height. Let the ball has some angular velocity ωi just before the collision.
Invent other variables as necessary.
What equations can you write?

If I let the ball have a given angular velocity I can write conservation of angular momentum? I can give the Rod an angular velocity after the collision of ωf.

Kinetic energy is conserved so ½mvi2= ½Mvf2; where Where v=ωr so;
½mωi^2 R^2 = ½M ωf^2 L^2

I could use angular momentum of the ball = mvr? Where v=ωr so;

mωr2= 1/3ML2ωf?

I'm still a bit lost as to how to proceed. I'm still not sure how I can isolate R in terms of L with what I have? Am I missing a variable here?
 
You have the KE of the rod wrong. You need to consider its rotational energy.
When you have that corrected you will have two equations. What variable in them do you need to eliminate?
 
So I have the Ek's as equal:

Eqn1: 1/6 ML2ωF2= 1/2mωi2R2

Equation 2 is the conservation of angular momentum;
Eqn 2: mω2iR^2 = 1/3ML2ωf

Eliminating ωf I get

mR^2 = 1/3 ML^2EDIT: So final answer as R= √(1/3)M/m *L


Which is still leaving me with the length in terms of the masses, is this okay? Or is my physics still incorrect?

Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Oliver Legote said:
So I have the Ek's as equal:

Eqn1: 1/6 ML2ωF2= 1/2mωi2R2

Equation 2 is the conservation of angular momentum;
Eqn 2: mω2iR^2 = 1/3ML2ωf

Eliminating ωf I get

mR^2 = 1/3 ML^2EDIT: So final answer as R= √(1/3)M/m *L


Which is still leaving me with the length in terms of the masses, is this okay? Or is my physics still incorrect?

Thanks :)
That all looks right.
The question specifies the variables m, M and L, so you should expect all of those to turn up in the answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top