Conservation of Energy in a Spring-Powered Glider on an Incline

  • Thread starter Thread starter student34
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Work-energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance a spring is compressed in a spring-powered glider scenario on a frictionless incline. Key equations related to energy conservation are provided, highlighting the relationship between spring potential energy and the glider's kinetic and potential energy. Participants express confusion about determining the spring's compression distance, questioning the adequacy of the given information. The conversation emphasizes understanding energy transformations as the glider moves along the incline. Ultimately, the resolution involves recognizing the energy contributions at the glider's highest point.
student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement



A 0.0900 kg glider is pushed up a 40.0° frictionless incline by a spring. The spring's constant is k = 640 N/m with negligible mass. The glider reaches a distance of 1.80 m along the inclined track after losing contact with the spring and then slides back down. What distance is the spring originally compressed?

Homework Equations



0.5kX2^2 - 0.5kX1^2 = 0.5mV2^2 - 0.5mV1^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I have absolutely no idea how we can possibly know the distance of the spring's comression. There does not seem to be enough information here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can you say about the potential and kinetic energy of the glider when it reaches its highest point? Where did that energy come from?
 
tms said:
What can you say about the potential and kinetic energy of the glider when it reaches its highest point? Where did that energy come from?

Ahhhh, I see, thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top