Conservation of energy of a block problem

AI Thread Summary
A block of mass 3.5 kg slides down a 60° inclined plane with a length of 6 m and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.3. The initial energy is converted into kinetic energy and work done against friction, leading to the calculation of the block's speed at the bottom. The correct approach involves either using energy conservation or kinematics separately, as mixing them can lead to errors. After recalculating, the final speed of the block is determined to be 9.2 m/s. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy methods and understanding friction's role in the calculations.
aeroengphys
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A block of mass 3.5kg slides down an inclined plane of length 6m that makes an angle of 60° with the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the incline is 0.3. If the block is released from rest at the top of the incline, what is its speed at the bottom. Assume that the acceleration due to gravity is 10m/s².


Homework Equations


PE(top) = KE (bottom) + W(nc)
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



mgh = 1/2mv² + Fscosθ
(3.5kg)(10m/s²)(5.2m) = 1/2(3.5kg)(v²) + (F)(6m)(cos60)

...F = ma
...F|| - Ff = ma
...mgsinθ - μmgcosθ = ma
...gsinθ - μgcosθ = a
...(10m/s²)(sin60) - (.3)(10m/s²)(cos60) = a
...7.16m/s² = a

182J = 1.75(v²) + (3.5kg)(7.16m/s²)(6m)(cos60)
v² = 61.04m/s
v = 7.8 m/s

The one thing I wasn't sure of was whether or not I substituted for F correctly in the Fscosθ part. If you could let me know if I did that correctly, I'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aeroengphys said:

The Attempt at a Solution



mgh = 1/2mv² + Fscosθ
(3.5kg)(10m/s²)(5.2m) = 1/2(3.5kg)(v²) + (F)(6m)(cos60)
Looks like you are applying energy methods--a perfectly good approach. But I don't understand your last term, which should be the work done against friction. What is F equal to? (It's not the net force!) You should be able to figure out the force of friction, evaluate the last term, and then solve for v.

...F = ma
...F|| - Ff = ma
...mgsinθ - μmgcosθ = ma
...gsinθ - μgcosθ = a
...(10m/s²)(sin60) - (.3)(10m/s²)(cos60) = a
...7.16m/s² = a
Here you have gone in a completely different direction. You correctly solved for the acceleration. If you wanted to solve for the final speed, you could treat it as a kinematics problem. For some reason you were able to account for friction here, but not earlier in your energy equation. (Compare the terms that I marked in red.)

182J = 1.75(v²) + (3.5kg)(7.16m/s²)(6m)(cos60)
v² = 61.04m/s
v = 7.8 m/s
For some reason, you have (incorrectly) used the acceleration in your energy equation. This doesn't make sense.

There are two (related) ways to solve this: (1) Energy method--as in your first equation, or (2) Find the acceleration and use kinematics. Use one or the other--or both--but keep them separate.
 
Last edited:
I see what you mean. So let's see, if I were to use what i previously solved (acceleration) and were to do this problem using kinematics, I'd get:

x = v0t + ½ at²
(6m) = 1/2(7.16m/s²)t²
t = 1.29s

then:

v = vo + at
v = 0m/s + (7.16m/s²)(1.29s)
v = 9.2m/s
 
Good! Now I strongly recommend that you go back and correct your other solution using energy conservation. See if you get the same answer.
 
using the energy method:

mgh = 1/2mv² + Fscosθ
(3.5kg)(10m/s²)(5.2m) = 1/2(3.5kg)(v²) + ((.3)(3.5kg)(10m/s²)(cos60))(6m)(cos0)

work that out and...

v = 9.2 m/s

Thanks for you help Doc Al. We're just beginning conservation of energy, so this is still a little bit new to me. But thanks for helping me point out my mistakes. It seems like my mistakes have helped me learn a new strategy for checking my work...thanks again.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top