Conservation of Energy roller coaster car

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of curvature for a roller coaster car using conservation of energy principles. The initial approach involved finding the velocity at the top of the hill using gravitational potential energy, but the calculated radius of curvature was incorrect. Participants emphasized the importance of considering the net force acting on the car, which includes both the gravitational force and the normal force experienced by the passenger. It was clarified that these forces should be subtracted to find the net force pointing towards the center of curvature. Despite multiple attempts, the correct radius of curvature remains elusive, with confusion persisting over the calculations.
kiwikahuna
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A roller coaster car starts from rest and descends 40 m before rising 20 m to the top of a hill. The passenger of mass 75 kg at the top of the hill feels a normal force of 368 N. The radius of curvature of the hill is...?


Homework Equations



F = m * a
a = v^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



Because we are given the force and the mass the person, I found the acceleration and set acceleration = v^2/r. Velocity isn't given so I used the kinematics equation: Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2a(distance)
where Vi =0 and distance = 60. Once I found the velocity I went back and plugged that number into a =v^2/ r to find the radius but I'm not getting the right answer at all. Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The title of your post is "conservation of energy." It doesn't appear that you've applied this concept to your attempt at the solution.

I suggest you find the velocity at the top of the hill by simply considering the change in gravitational potential energy associated with the roller coaster's descent and subsequent ascent.

Please also note the kinematics equation you provided cannot be used because that equation is only valid under constant acceleration.
 
Thank you for the suggestions.
I used the conservation of energy formula:

mg(h1) = 1/2 mv^2 + mg(h2)
where h1 = 40 m and h2 =20 m
I find the velocity to be 19.8 m/s at the top of the 20 m hill.

I plugged the velocity back into a = v^2/r and I get r to be 80 m but it's still not the right answer (which is actually 30m )
 
kiwikahuna said:
Thank you for the suggestions.
I used the conservation of energy formula:

mg(h1) = 1/2 mv^2 + mg(h2)
where h1 = 40 m and h2 =20 m
I find the velocity to be 19.8 m/s at the top of the 20 m hill.

I plugged the velocity back into a = v^2/r and I get r to be 80 m but it's still not the right answer (which is actually 30m )

Draw a free-body diagram of the car, noting that it as at the TOP of the hill. Also note that the net force must be equal to the quantity (mv^2)/r. How do the normal force and force due to gravity relate? What does this say about the radius of curvature?
 
there's a gravitational force down (with the mass of both the cart and the person)

There's a normal force going up. But this is the normal force that the person feels. To find the net force, you would have to add these two forces together? Any more explanation on this topic would be very helpful. Conceptually I don't understand why you would have to add these two forces together as opposed to subtracting them.
 
The normal force and the gravitational force act in opposite directions. Thus, you would in fact subtract them to find the net force. The force due to gravity is stronger than the normal force, so the net force points towards the center of curvature, as it should. However, I am getting 80 m for my answer, just like you. I cannot figure out why 30 m is recorded as the correct answer.

I've done countless problems like this in the past, so I do not know where I'm going wrong.

It'd be great if anyone else could chime in.


kiwikahuna said:
there's a gravitational force down (with the mass of both the cart and the person)

There's a normal force going up. But this is the normal force that the person feels. To find the net force, you would have to add these two forces together? Any more explanation on this topic would be very helpful. Conceptually I don't understand why you would have to add these two forces together as opposed to subtracting them.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top