Conservation of energy, Rolling without slipping.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of energy in a bowling ball rolling without slipping up an inclined plane. The ball, with an initial speed of 2.00 m/s, reaches a height of 0.29 m before momentarily stopping. The total kinetic energy, comprising both translational and rotational components, is equated to gravitational potential energy to derive the height. The moment of inertia for a solid sphere is utilized, confirming that the correct height is indeed 0.29 m, as calculated using the formula d = (7v²)/(10g).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of translational and rotational kinetic energy
  • Familiarity with the moment of inertia of a solid sphere
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy concepts
  • Ability to apply the rolling without slipping condition
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for different shapes
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in mechanics
  • Explore the implications of rolling motion in physics
  • Investigate the application of constant acceleration equations in various scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation in rolling motion.

quantumlolz
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bowling ball is rolling without slipping up an inclined plane. As it passes a point O it has a speed of 2.00 m/s up the plane. It reaches a vertical height h above O before momentarily stopping and rolling back down. Determine the value of h. The moment of inertia of a solid sphere of mass M and radius R is I = \frac{2MR^2}{5}

Homework Equations



Translational kinetic energy \frac{mv^2}{2}
Rotational kinetic energy \frac {I\omega^2}{2}
Rolling without slipping v = r\omega
Gravitational potential energy U = mgy
Constant acceleration formulae maybe?

The Attempt at a Solution



Equating Total (rotational and translational) kinetic energy and potential energy \frac{Mv^2}{2} + \frac {I\omega^2}{2} = Mgy as all the energy has been converted from kinetic to potential when the ball stops (i.e. at the height we're trying to find)

Inserting the expression for moment of inertia the rotational kinetic energy is \frac{MR^2\omega^2}{5} but for rolling without slipping this is just \frac{Mv^2}{5} so total kinetic energy becomes T = \frac{Mv^2}{2} + \frac{Mv^2}{5} = \frac {7Mv^2}{10}

So \frac{7Mv^2}{10} = Mgy and we can cancel the Ms to get \frac {7v^2}{10} = gy

At some value of y (lets call it d), v = 2.00 m/s so plugging in the numbers d = \frac{7v^2}{10g} = 0.29m

Then I'm not sure what to do next. I was thinking we've got an initial velocity (2 m/s), a final velocity (0 m/s), an acceleration (g), and we want the vertical displacement, h, from O to give a final velocity of 0 m/s so we can then apply constant acceleration equation v^2 = u^2 + 2gh, with v = 2, u = 0 and solving this gives h = \frac{v^2}{2g} but this comes to h = 0.20m, the quoted answer is h = 0.29 m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got the correct result, h=0.29 m, only you did not notice.

You can take the potential equal to zero at any point, here a good choice is at point O.

At point O the ball has vo=2m/s velocity and it rolls upward. You calculated the KE with this velocity, correctly. This KE transforms to potential energy h height above O, where the potential energy with respect to O, is mgh. As you wrote,

<br /> d = \frac{7v^2}{10g} =0.29 m<br />

But d is the height h which was the question. You got it!

ehild
 
ehild said:
You got the correct result, h=0.29 m, only you did not notice.

You can take the potential equal to zero at any point, here a good choice is at point O.

At point O the ball has vo=2m/s velocity and it rolls upward. You calculated the KE with this velocity, correctly. This KE transforms to potential energy h height above O, where the potential energy with respect to O, is mgh. As you wrote,

<br /> d = \frac{7v^2}{10g} =0.29 m<br />

But d is the height h which was the question. You got it!

ehild

Ah cool, I did spot that I got the right number when I was working it out, but wasnt sure why - turns out I'd completely forgotten that I can choose where the potential is zero. Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
935
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K