Conservation of Energy with Friction

AI Thread Summary
A 179 g block is launched from a spring with a potential energy of 2.25 J on a frictionless surface, transitioning to a surface with a coefficient of friction of 0.27. The energy loss due to friction is calculated to be approximately 0.40258 J per slide, leading to the conclusion that the block makes five complete trips across the frictional zone before stopping. The remaining energy after these trips is 0.237 J, allowing for a partial trip of 50 cm, resulting in the block coming to rest 35 cm from the left end of the frictional surface. The discussion also touches on the distinction between static and dynamic friction, noting that static friction does not apply in this scenario.
SpaXe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 179 g block is launched by compressing a spring of constant k=200 N/m a distance of 15 cm. The spring is mounted horizontally, and the surface directly under it is frictionless. But beyond the equilibrium position of the spring end, the surface has coefficient of friction \mu = 0.27. This frictional surface extends 85 cm, followed by a frictionless curved rise, as shown in the figure:

Code:
                        |
                       /
|xxxx|[ ]             /
---------=========---/
         ^           ^---- Imagine this as a bottom right quarter of a circle.
         |                     Things go up and slide down with no friction
         |-- Friction
               85 cm

After launch, where does the block finally come to rest? Measure from the left end of the frictional zone.

Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy:
KE_i + PE_i + WE_i= KE_f + PE_f + WE_f

The Attempt at a Solution



So, values:

m = 0.179 kg

k = 200 N/m
x = -0.15 m

\mu = 0.27
d_{friction} = 0.85 m
F_{normal} = mg = 0.179 * 9.8

----

The initial total energy is the spring's potential energy. All other initial energies are zero. So:

PE_i = 1/2kx^2 = 1/2(200)(0.15) = 2.25 J

Then, I proceeded to calculate the energy loss due to friction, by the amount of work done:

WE_{per slide} = F_{friction} d_{friction} = \mu F_{normal} d_{friction} = 0.27 \times (0.179)(9.8) \times 0.85 = 0.40258 J

I found out that, if I divide the first by the second, it takes the 6th slide (back and forth) to actually "stop" the box from sliding, but at this point I'm really lost. The remaining energy might not be enough, for example, to overcome the static friction, and I'm unsure as to how to approach this problem anymore.

Any help would be appreciated. This problem is a bonus problem in one of my assessments, and I don't really need it solved to pass. But I'd really love to know how to solve it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, never mind me. I solved it with a friend's help. Yay!

If you divide the first by the second, the remainder is 0.237 J. Using that information, I was able to calculate the distance travelled, 50cm. So, subtract that from 85cm, it stopped at 35cm from the left of the frictional surface.

(Work = Force * distance, or 0.237 = Friction Force * distance.)
 
SpaXe said:
The initial total energy is the spring's potential energy. All other initial energies are zero. So:

PE_i = 1/2kx^2 = 1/2(200)(0.15) = 2.25 J

Then, I proceeded to calculate the energy loss due to friction, by the amount of work done:

WE_{per slide} = F_{friction} d_{friction} = \mu F_{normal} d_{friction} = 0.27 \times (0.179)(9.8) \times 0.85 = 0.40258 J
Good.

I found out that, if I divide the first by the second, it takes the 6th slide (back and forth) to actually "stop" the box from sliding, but at this point I'm really lost. The remaining energy might not be enough, for example, to overcome the static friction, and I'm unsure as to how to approach this problem anymore.
You found that it makes 5 complete trips across the friction patch and one partial trip. Find the length of that partial trip.
 
You found that it makes 5 complete trips across the friction patch and one partial trip. Find the length of that partial trip.

Thanks! That's exactly what I had to do.

As a side question, though, how does this problem relate to the concept of static friction and dynamic friction?
 
Static friction doesn't play a role in this problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top