Conservation of Energy With Loss Due to Friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum compression of a spring when an elevator falls and compresses it after a cable snap. The potential energy of the elevator is initially calculated as U(x) = mgd, but energy loss due to friction must also be accounted for, leading to the equation U(x) - f. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly incorporating the friction force throughout the elevator's descent and adjusting the gravitational potential energy calculations to include the spring's compression. The final equation becomes a quadratic form that needs to be solved for the compression distance x. Clarifications on measuring distances and the role of friction are provided to ensure accurate calculations.
seichan
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Conservation of Energy With Loss Due to Friction

Homework Statement



The cable of an elevator of mass m= 2690 kg snaps when the elevator is a rest at one of the floors of a skyscraper. At this point the elevator is a distance d= 75.0 m above a cushioning spring whose spring constant is k= 9700 N/m. A safety device clamps the elevator against the guide rails so that a constant frictional force of f= 9358 N opposes the motion of the elevator. Find the maximum distance by which the cushioning spring will be compressed.

Homework Equations


U(x)=mgh
w(x)=1/2kx^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, I thought this problew was pretty straight forward. I first calculated the potential energy for the elevator when it is at rest, in which I found to be U(x)=mgd. This would be equal to the Kinetic friction at the bottom, however, there is energy loss to friction. So, the energy when the elevator hits the spring is U(x)-Force of friction, or mgd-f. We can set this eqaul to the amount of work done by the spring and solve for x. In other words: sqrt((2(mgd-f))/k)=x. The displacement is negative, so we want the negative value of this square root. I have put this answer into my web assignment a few times and cannot figure out where I am going wrong (I've tried using a positive value for the displacement as well). If you could tell me where my reasoning is wrong, that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When calculating the gravitational PE, don't forget to include the distance that the spring compresses.
 
Doc Al said:
When calculating the gravitational PE, don't forget to include the distance that the spring compresses.

Thank you very much- but how do I isolate x in that case?

1/2kx^2=mg(d+x)-f
=mgd+mgx-f
1/2kx^2-mgx=mgd-f

Also, can't I look at the top of the spring as the x-axis? That was the asumption I was going with.
 
seichan said:
Thank you very much- but how do I isolate x in that case?

1/2kx^2=mg(d+x)-f
=mgd+mgx-f
1/2kx^2-mgx=mgd-f
That "f" should be the work done by friction, not just the friction force.

You'll end up with a quadratic equation. Solve it!

Also, can't I look at the top of the spring as the x-axis? That was the asumption I was going with.
Not sure what you mean. You can certainly measure distances from the top of the spring, but in that case your final position will have a gravitational PE term. (If that's what you mean.)
 
To clarify, it should be:
1/2kx^2=mg(d+x)-fx
1/2kx^2=mgd+(mg-f)x
1/2kx^2-(mg-f)x-mgd=0
Right? Thank you for your help =)
 
The friction force acts throughout the motion, not just over the distance x. Redo the work done against friction.
 
Thank you so much =) It's correct
 
Back
Top