Conservation of mechanical energy vs sum of forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriate application of the conservation of mechanical energy versus the sum of forces to determine the final velocity of a mass on a slope affected by a spring and external forces. It highlights a discrepancy between two methods: one using the work-energy theorem and the other employing Newton's second law. The calculations reveal different final velocities, prompting questions about when to use each approach. The consensus is that both methods should yield the same result if applied correctly, suggesting a potential error in one of the calculations. Understanding the conditions under which each method is applicable is crucial for accurate problem-solving in mechanics.
Donovan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When do one use the principle of conservation of mechanical energy to find the velocity of a mass, and when would you use the sum of forces equals to the mass times acceleration, and there after use a ds=v dv in order to find the velocity.

The specific question related to this is a spring fixed to a mass which is pulled up a slope by a constant force. They want the final velocity. I already have the force in terms of distance that the spring applies of the mass. I have the constant force etc.

I used sum of F's = ma and a ds = v dv in order to find velocity. In the memo however They used conservation of energy: T1 +V1 +U1-2 = T2 +V2. My answer is different to the memo. Should'nt the answer be the same? and if not? Whats the two cases that splits these two methods of approach?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Donovan said:
When do one use the principle of conservation of mechanical energy to find the velocity of a mass, and when would you use the sum of forces equals to the mass times acceleration, and there after use a ds=v dv in order to find the velocity.

The specific question related to this is a spring fixed to a mass which is pulled up a slope by a constant force. They want the final velocity. I already have the force in terms of distance that the spring applies of the mass. I have the constant force etc.

I used sum of F's = ma and a ds = v dv in order to find velocity. In the memo however They used conservation of energy: T1 +V1 +U1-2 = T2 +V2. My answer is different to the memo. Should'nt the answer be the same? and if not? Whats the two cases that splits these two methods of approach?

Yes, the answers should be the same. Can you post the detailed work for both methods? We can help to find the error(s). :-)
 
Question: calculate speed of block at final position.
GIven: block on slope of 15 degree incline attached to spring; spring applies force down the slope with stiffness of 450 N/m; frictional coefficient= 0.28 kinetic and 0.3 static; constant force of 150N applied up the slope; final position has spring stretched to 0.2m; initial position has string unstretched and block velocity of 0 m/s.

Calculated: work done by applied force=30J ; work done by frictional force= -4,327; potential energy of spring in final position = 9J.

According to work energy theorem (memo):
T1+V1+U1-2=T2+V2
0+0+30-4,327=0.5 * (80/9) * (V squared)+9+4,141
V=1,753 m/sAccording to sum of forces:
sum of F = ma
150-80sin15 - 21,64-450x=80a
a=1,346 - 5,625x

since a ds=v dv

integrate...
1,346*0,2-(5,625/2)*(0.2 squared)=0,5*(V squared)
V=0,56 m/s

Thanks for the help
 
Back
Top