Conservation of momentum and relative velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying the conservation of momentum to a scenario where two people jump off a stationary boat. The key equations are set up to determine the final speed of the boat after each person jumps off in various sequences and directions. The user expresses confidence in their ability to solve for the final speed but seeks validation on the physics behind their equations. They specifically mention the challenge of understanding relative velocity in this context. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of momentum conservation in multi-body systems.
anotherghost
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So you've got two people standing on a boat, everything at rest, and the masses of both people as well as the boat are known. Let's call them Richard and Sandra, so the variables are Mr (mass of Richard), Ms (mass of Sandra), and Mb (mass of boat). When one of these people jumps off the side of the boat, they have a velocity of 3.5m/s relative to the boat.

The problem asks to find the final speed of the boat Mbf after:
a) Both people jump off in the same direction at the same time.
b) First Richard jumps off, then Sandra a few seconds later, both in the same direction.
c) First Sandra jumps off, then Richard a few seconds later, both in the same direction.
d) First Richard jumps off to the right, then a few seconds later Sandra jumps off to the left.

Homework Equations



I guess just conservation of momentum.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) 0 = Mb * Vbf + (Mr + Ms)(3.5 + Vbf)

b) 0 = (Mb + Ms) * Vbs + Mr * (3.5 + Vbs)
(Mb + Ms) * Vbs = Mb * Vbf + Ms * (3.5 + Vbf)

c) 0 = (Mb + Mr) * Vbr + Ms * (3.5 + Vbr)
(Mb + Mr) * Vbr = Mb * Vbf + Mr * (3.5 + Vbf)

d) 0 = (Mb + Ms) * Vbs + Mr * (3.5 + Vbs)
(Mb + Ms) * Vbs = Mb * Vbf + Ms * (-3.5 + Vbs)

After these equations, of course, you solve for Vbf. I can do that part easily but I want to make sure the physics of these equations are right. My rationale is that I can first equate 0 (because the system starts at rest) with the first jump, and then equate the system without the person who jumped off with the second jump. I solve the first equation for the velocity needed in the left side of the second equation, then I solve the second equation for Vbf.

I am not sure if these are even remotely right or not - they make sense to me, but I'm not sure! Relative velocity is confusing. Please somebody give me a hand, even if it's only on one part.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me. Very tricky business.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top