Conservation of Momentum in Different Frames of Reference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum in different frames of reference, specifically analyzing a gun and bullet scenario. The initial calculation shows that momentum is conserved in a stationary observer's frame, leading to the equation m1v1 = m2v2. However, when transitioning to the gun's frame of reference, it is noted that this frame is non-inertial due to the gun's recoil, which introduces pseudo forces. As a result, the conservation of momentum must be modified in non-inertial frames, indicating that the initial analysis is flawed. Understanding the distinction between inertial and non-inertial frames is crucial for correctly applying the conservation laws.
quantised
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

The following may be a simple problem. But, your thoughts will be very much appreciated.

Homework Statement



Let's use a gun with mass m1 and a bullet m2. The bullet is fired in the positive direction with speed v2, and the gun recoils in the negative direction with speed v1.

Because the momentum is conserved, m1v1 = m2v2.

Hence, v2 can be calculated if m1, m2 and v1 are all known. In other words, v2 = m1v1 / m2. This calculation is from a stationary observer's frame of reference, outside the gun/bullet system.

Homework Equations



Now, I want to transform the same problem to the gun's frame of reference. (Hypothetically, it's an ant or a small person sitting at the muzzle observing the event!)

In this new frame of reference, the bullet moves at the following final speed: vb, final = v2 - v1. The initial speed vinitial is zero, because the gun and the bullet are stationary. Therefore:

m2 (v2 - v1) = (m1 + m2) vinitial = 0

This means that v1 = v2.

The Attempt at a Solution



Clearly, the answer from the first frame should be equal to the answer in the second frame.

Can someone please indicate to me where my working is incorrect?

Thanks in advance.

Quantised
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that your chosen frame of reference is not an inertial frame -- it will experience an acceleration while the gun is being fired, which means there will be some transient pseudo forces operating on all objects measured from that frame. Physical laws (like conservation of momentum) do not apply without modification to non-inertial frames of reference.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top