Conservation of Momentum involving Vf, elastic collisions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving the conservation of momentum and elastic collisions, where an initial calculation yielded a speed of 12.5 m/s, assuming an elastic collision. The correct answer is actually 6.32 m/s at a 41.5-degree angle, indicating a non-elastic collision with energy values showing a loss in kinetic energy. Participants express confusion over the textbook's answer, suggesting it may belong to a different problem or be a mix-up. They confirm that in elastic collisions between identical masses, velocities are exchanged, and the discrepancy likely arises from an oversight in the problem's setup. The conversation highlights the importance of clear problem statements and accurate calculations in physics.
ericcy
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A billiard ball of mass 0.155kg moves with a velocity of 12.5m/s toward a stationary billiard ball of identical mass and strikes it in a head-on collision. The first billiard ball comes to a complete stop. Determine whether the collision was elastic.
Relevant Equations
Pt=Pt`
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1`+m2v2`
I tried solving it using this method and I got 12.5m/s, and assumed the collision was elastic.

The answer is actually 6.32m/s [41.5 degrees counterclockwise from the original direction of the first ball]; the collision is not elastic: Ek = 12.1J Ek`= 10.2J

I have absolutely no idea how the textbook could even get this answer. If you could explain the steps and why that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show the details of your calculation. If the collision is head-on, there is no scattering angle involved. Where did the 41.5 deg. counterclockwise come from?
 
That was the textbooks answer, I have no idea how they got that. The collision is head-on. I used m1v1=m2v2` and subbed in all the values except for v2` and got 12.5m/s for m2. This means that when I solved for the total energies before and after the collision to check if it was elastic, they were both the same (12.1=12.1). Would you say my answer is right?
 
ericcy said:
That was the textbooks answer, I have no idea how they got that. The collision is head-on. I used m1v1=m2v2` and subbed in all the values except for v2` and got 12.5m/s for m2. This means that when I solved for the total energies before and after the collision to check if it was elastic, they were both the same (12.1=12.1). Would you say my answer is right?
Yes. When balls of identical mass collide and the collision is elastic, they simply exchange velocities. This is the case here. I have no idea where the textbook got that answer either. Are there more parts to this problem? Maybe the answer belongs to a different part.
 
  • Like
Likes ericcy
kuruman said:
Yes. When balls of identical mass collide and the collision is elastic, they simply exchange velocities. This is the case here. I have no idea where the textbook got that answer either. Are there more parts to this problem? Maybe the answer belongs to a different part.
Nope. Just that question. That's what made me so confused because I had literally no idea whatsoever how they could have gotten that answer. Must have been a mix up. Thanks for the confirmation on the answer :)
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman
You were rightfully confused. The answer appears to belong to a two-dimensional collision problem. :oldsmile:
 
Curiously, the 12.1J does match the initial linear KE in the question. I think a lot of these textbook errors come about because someone adapted an existing question and failed to update the answer.

But there is anyway another problem here. It does not say exactly how the first ball was moving. If it had traveled any distance it would surely have been rolling, so its total KE would have been 17J. If the collision lost no mechanical energy, the second ball must have set off with the same rotation rate, but since that would have come about by static friction the second ball's rotation would be backspin.
 
Back
Top