Conservation of Momentum of a can

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of momentum and angular momentum in a system of coupled metronomes. It highlights how energy transfer and coupling effects lead to synchronization among the metronomes, with the angles between them becoming approximately equal over time. The role of resonance is emphasized, explaining that when the forcing frequency aligns with the resonance frequency, the amplitude of oscillation increases significantly. Additionally, it notes that non-linear behavior is necessary for the metronomes to adjust their frequencies and synchronize effectively. Overall, the interaction of these dynamics illustrates a practical example of mode-locking in coupled non-linear systems.
affordable
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1TMZASCR-I&feature=related
Why does this happen?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think it's because of the conservation of angular momentum moving the cans, but I'm still confused as to why the angles between the metronomes must be approximately equal after a short amount of time. I understand that it has to do with coupling effects and that they transfer energy in between the metronomes, but I'm having difficulty finding what coupling actually means.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably also have to consider resonance too, which for a forced linear oscillator means that the amplitude of the oscillator can increase a lot when the forcing frequency is near the resonance frequency, which for the depicted setup means a particular metronome will force other metronomes with a higher amplitude when it moves in synchronization with the common (forcing) board. For the metronomes to also change frequency to synchronize across each other you need them to be (at least) a bit non-linear so that the frequency of the metronome is coupled with its amplitude.

In general, you can expect find mode-locking dynamics in almost any set of coupled non-linear systems, but I must admit that this is a very neat and classroom-friendly example of such.

Probably wouldn't work with my wife's electronic metronome though :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top