Conservation principles and particle-particle reactions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on conservation principles in particle-particle reactions, particularly in the context of electron-positron annihilation. Participants confirm that charge, baryon number, and lepton number are conserved in the reaction where an electron and positron produce two photons. They emphasize the importance of checking these conservation laws, as well as energy-momentum conservation, in analyzing particle interactions. A specific example highlights that while charge is conserved, baryon number is not conserved in another proposed reaction involving a neutron and a photon. The conversation concludes with a call for further validation from a particle physics expert.
Jimmy Ridley
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
New poster has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template in the schoolwork forums
Please can someone help explain these to me? I have completed a-d but I'm not how e works. I thought gamma was an exchange particle so should it then decay further?

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-07-24 at 12.12.01 am.png
    Screen Shot 2018-07-24 at 12.12.01 am.png
    7 KB · Views: 450
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The ##\gamma## is a photon that forms in electron-positron annihilation in part (e). You're supposed to check that charge conservation, lepton number conservation, energy-momentum conservation and others are satisfied in these reactions. For example, the charge conservation in the reaction (e) is okay because both the reactants and products have total electric charge of zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy Ridley
hilbert2 said:
The ##\gamma## is a photon that forms in electron-positron annihilation in part (e). You're supposed to check that charge conservation, lepton number conservation, energy-momentum conservation and others are satisfied in these reactions. For example, the charge conservation in the reaction (e) is okay because both the reactants and products have total electric charge of zero.

okay so for (e)

charge is conserved
baryon number is conserved
and lepton number is conserved?
 
Yes, charge is conserved, and there are no baryons in the reaction so the baryon number is zero on both sides. The electron and positron have electron lepton numbers of 1 and -1, so they also sum to 0. Now you should also show somehow that the four-momentum can be conserved in that relativistic collision where an electron and positron turn into two photons.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy Ridley
hilbert2 said:
Yes, charge is conserved, and there are no baryons in the reaction so the baryon number is zero on both sides. The electron and positron have electron lepton numbers of -1 and 1, so they also sum to 0. Now you should also show somehow that the four-momentum can be conserved in that relativistic collision where an electron and positron turn into two photons.
okay thank you so much, am I also right is saying that (f) is not possible, as

charge is conserved
but baryon number is not conserved as it has baryon number 0 on the left, and 1 on the right? (the neutron has baryon number 1 and the photon has baryon number 0)?
 
Jimmy Ridley said:
charge is conserved
but baryon number is not conserved as it has baryon number 0 on the left, and 1 on the right? (the neutron has baryon number 1 and the photon has baryon number 0)?

It would seem like that to me, but let's wait if someone more professional in particles physics agrees with this.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy Ridley
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top