Conserved currents in Mandl & Shaw (section 2.4)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmlaniel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Currents
jmlaniel
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I am currently reading "Quantum Field Theory" by Mandl & Shaw (2nd edition). In section 2.4, they give an equation for obtaining a conserved quantity (which leave the Lagrangian density invariant) :

\frac{\delta f^\alpha}{\delta x^\alpha} = 0 (2.36 in Mandl & Shaw)

In other textbooks that I have consulted, I usually find the following expression for a conserved quantity :

\frac{\partial f^\alpha}{\partial x^\alpha} = 0

I would like to know why is Mandl & Shaw using what seems to be a functional derivative instead of a simple partial derivative.

Furthermore, does anyone know how to work with the functional derivative used by Mandl & Shaw and how to obtain equation (2.36a) with it? Can I treat it as a simple derivative? It seems wrong to do so...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is a mistake. You don’t take functional derivative with respect to coordinates. If that section of the book is about Noether’s theorem, then the following might help you understand the connection functional and partial derivatives;
Let s(x) be a space-like hyper surface passes through a specific point x. Let us define a 4-vector differential area at the point x by
<br /> ds^{\mu}=(dx^{1}dx^{2}dx^{3},dx^{0}dx^{1}dx^{2},dx^{0}dx^{1}dx^{3},dx^{0}dx^{2}dx^{3})<br />
Now, let Q be a functional of a surface s. The functional derivative at a point x is defined by
<br /> \frac{\delta Q<s>}{\delta s(x)}= \lim_{v(x) \rightarrow 0} \frac{Q[\bar{s}]-Q<s>}{v(x)}<br /> </s></s>
where v(x) is the volume enclosed between the two surfaces \bar{s} and s.
Now let Q be given by
Q<s>= \int_{s} ds_{\mu} f^{\mu}(x),</s>
where f_{\mu}(x) is some smooth vector field, then according to Gauss’ theorem we find
\frac{\delta Q}{\delta s}= \lim_{v \rightarrow 0} \frac{\int_{\bar{s}}ds_{\mu}f^{\mu}(x) - \int_{s} ds_{\mu}f^{\mu}(x)}{v(x)}=\partial_{\mu}f^{\mu}
Using this, Schwinger was able to prove the following (very, very useful) identity
<br /> \int ds_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}F(x) = \int ds_{\nu}\partial_{\mu}F(x),<br />
where
|\vec{x}|^{2}F(x)\rightarrow 0,\ \ \mbox{as}\ \ |\vec{x}| \rightarrow \infty

sam
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top