Consider the potential field V(x, y) which is 0 and -Vo(Vo>0

  • Thread starter Thread starter pallab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential field V(x, y) that is 0 for y > 0 and -Vo for y < 0, focusing on the angles of incidence and refraction as a particle crosses the x-axis. Participants analyze the relationship between the angles θ and θ' using Snell's law, questioning its applicability to particle dynamics compared to light. The conversation highlights the need to derive a modified version of Snell's law for particles, considering changes in velocity components as the particle transitions between potential energy regions. There is uncertainty regarding the correct interpretation of kinetic energy changes and the implications of a positive Vo on particle velocities and angles. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying physics when applying mathematical principles to particle motion in potential fields.
pallab
Messages
43
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Consider the potential field V(x, y) which is 0 and -Vo (V0 > 0) respectively in the regions
of y greater and less than zero . Let θ and θ' be the angles of incidence and refraction of
the particle with the y-axis at the point of incidence as it crosses the x-axis . The ratio
sin(θ) / sin(θ ') is given (in terms of Δ = Vo / E) by
region1
upload_2017-4-5_19-53-33.png
region2
(a)√(1+2Vο/E)
(b)√(1+Vο/E)
(c)1+Vο/E
(d)1+2Vο/E

Homework Equations


nsinθ=n'sinθ'
sinθ/sinθ'=v/v'[where v=velocity of particle in 1 & v'in 2]

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2mv2=E=1/2mv'2-Vο
1/2mv'2-1/2mv2=Vο
(v'2 -v2)/v2=2Vο/mv2
(v'2 /v2 )-1=Vο/(1/2mv2)
∴sinθ'/sinθ=√(1+Vο/E)

Which is similar to option b but in question it is sinθ/sinθ'
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pallab said:
sinθ/sinθ'=v/v' [where v=velocity of particle in 1 & v'in 2]
Are you sure this equation is correct? If Vo is positive, which would be larger: v or v'? θ or θ'?
 
I have just used snell's law.
θ∝v
but I am not sure about increase or decrease of kinetic energy in the presence of potential +ve or -ve.
 
TSny said:
Are you sure this equation is correct? If Vo is positive, which would be larger: v or v'? θ or θ'?
I have just used snell's law.
θ∝v
but I am not sure about increase or decrease of kinetic energy in the presence of potential +ve or -ve.
 
This problem deals with a particle moving from a region of zero potential energy to another region of constant potential energy -Vo.

For this situation, Snell's law as written for light ##\frac{\sin \theta_1}{v_1} = \frac{\sin \theta_2}{v_2}## does not apply. Have you covered how Snell's law is modified for the particle situation?
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
This problem deals with a particle moving from a region of zero potential energy to another region of constant potential energy -Vo.

For this situation, Snell's law as written for light ##\frac{\sin \theta_1}{v_1} = \frac{\sin \theta_2}{v_2}## does not apply. Have you covered how Snell's law is modified for the particle situation?
No.
TSny said:
This problem deals with a particle moving from a region of zero potential energy to another region of constant potential energy -Vo.

For this situation, Snell's law as written for light ##\frac{\sin \theta_1}{v_1} = \frac{\sin \theta_2}{v_2}## does not apply. Have you covered how Snell's law is modified for the particle situation?
No.
 
Then you will need to derive "Snell's law" for the particle.

As a start, consider the x and y components of the velocity of the particle.
Does vx change when the particle passes through the origin?
Does vy change?
 
Back
Top