Consistency-related proof in predicate logic

Mr.Cauliflower
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Could someone please help me with the proof of the following statement?

Let L be language with n different constants and at least one predicate symbol. Prove that there exist 2 different maximal consistent sets formed of closed formulas of the language L.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know that if S is a consistent set of sentences (closed formulas), then there exists a maximal consistent extention S' of S (S' is an extention of S in the sense that S' \subseteq S)? To prove that there exist two different maximal consistent sets, find two consistent sets S and T such that any extention S' of S must be different from any extention T' of T.
 
AKG said:
Do you know that if S is a consistent set of sentences (closed formulas), then there exists a maximal consistent extention S' of S (S' is an extention of S in the sense that S' \subseteq S)?

You're right, I think I found it as Lindenbaum's lemma. Anyway, I don't know how to do this:

AKG said:
find two consistent sets S and T such that any extention S' of S must be different from any extention T' of T.
 
What have you tried? As a hint, it's very very easy. S and T need not be complicated at all.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top