Constant liquid pressure device

AI Thread Summary
To create a constant head device for measuring stream velocity, a bucket with a single inlet and two outlets can be effective, provided it maintains a steady water level. Filling the bucket and allowing water to overflow while ensuring the inflow exceeds the outflow will maintain constant pressure. For measuring the stream's cross-sectional area, using shadows cast on a surface may pose challenges due to indistinctness. An alternative method involves using a lens to capture an image of the stream, allowing for accurate diameter measurements through magnification. This approach ensures precise experimental results while utilizing common tools at home.
justrezza
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone could point me towards a source about making constant head devices. I was wanting to measure and then relate, experimentally, the velocity of a stream to its cross-sectional area. Since this will be done mostly at home using pedestrian tools, I need to find out how I can make a device to allow me to have constant pressure for my stream.

I was thinking of a bucket with one inlet and two outlets, but I'm not quite sure if that would work.

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An addendum. I intend to measure the cross sectional area of the stream using the shadows it casts on a surface, since measuring the stream diameter would be very hard.

However, here I encounter another problem, the shadows become indistinct as I cast them on the wall, and are useless to my measurements.
 
You should be able to use a bucket to create a stream with constant head. Just fill the bucket up and put a running hose in it. Then you can have a tube coming out the bottom and as long as there is more water going into the bucket than coming out (ie. the bucket is overflowing or at least staying at the same level) you will have a source of water at constant head.
 
You can use a lens to form an image of the stream and then measure the diameter on the image. Use the magnification to convert this to the real diameter. If you work at 2f for both image and object distance the magnification is x1.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top