Constant volume or constant pressure?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the assumptions made in a thermodynamic problem regarding heating air in a house with well-insulated walls. Participants explore whether the heating process should be considered at constant volume or constant pressure, and how these assumptions impact the calculations of energy required to increase the temperature of the air.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assumption of constant pressure during heating, suggesting that a constant volume might be more accurate since the house's volume does not change.
  • Another participant raises the issue of pressure, arguing that if the air is heated at constant pressure, the density decreases and questions where the air goes, implying that the air might perform work during expansion.
  • A participant queries how to define initial and final volumes when calculating work done by the air, indicating confusion about the application of the integral in the context of the problem.
  • One participant proposes a control volume approach, suggesting that the air expands and exits the house, thus keeping the pressure constant while requiring additional energy for the work done during expansion.
  • Another participant expresses concern that the phrasing of the problem implies a sealed environment, which could mislead interpretations about pressure changes and energy dynamics.
  • A later reply suggests that the house is insulated but not sealed, indicating that the air pressure inside the house remains equal to the outside pressure, which complicates the analysis of volume and number of molecules.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether to assume constant volume or constant pressure for the heating process. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of these assumptions on the calculations and physical behavior of the air in the house.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions of initial and final volumes in the context of work calculations and the implications of the house being insulated versus sealed. There are unresolved questions about how to accurately model the thermodynamic behavior of the air during heating.

yasar1967
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Constant volume or constant pressure??

In a question I tried to solved: "A house has well-insulated walls. It contains a volume of 100 m3 of air at 300 K. Calculate the energy required to increase the temperature of this diatomic ideal gas by 1.00°C." The solution start with the assumption by saying "consider heating it at constant pressure..." But why? wouldn't be a more accurate assumption if we said the volume is constant but not the pressure as -albeit slight- all temperature increase will result an increase in pressure as well due to P=nRT/V? Obviously house's volume is not changing!
Results is highly effected as which way you go either by Cp or Cv.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Interesting question. The house's volume isn't changing, but can't we also say the same about the pressure in the house (ie: the pressure in the house remains constant)? When we heat the air in the house at constant pressure, the density drops, so where does the air go? Can the air be doing any PdV work?
 


What is dV then? What would you put as "initial" and "final" volumes in W=Integral(PdV)?

On the other hand, if we calculate the Q by Q=nCvΔT or Q=nCpΔT we'd get totally different results.


Q_Goest said:
Interesting question. The house's volume isn't changing, but can't we also say the same about the pressure in the house (ie: the pressure in the house remains constant)? When we heat the air in the house at constant pressure, the density drops, so where does the air go? Can the air be doing any PdV work?
 


The best way to look at the Cv versus Cp issue is not so much constant volume versus constant pressure. That's fine, but it's a bit misleading as you can see in this example.

Consider putting a control volume around the air in the house instead of putting it around the house. A control volume in which there is no mass that crosses the control surface is called a "control mass". When you heat the air, it expands at constant pressure, so air goes out the windows and doors. Otherwise the house would need to be sealed and pressure inside the house would rise according to the ideal gas law. Consider that if the temperature rose from 270 K to 300 K, the pressure in the house would increase accordingly. But it doesn't. Pressure in the house stays the same. So your control mass is actually expanding and getting bigger as the temperature increases. What this is saying is the air is doing work, so there is additional energy needed to increase not just the temperature but to do the work in expanding the air. The final volume of air can then be determined from the equation of state (ideal gas law as applicable).

What is dV then? What would you put as "initial" and "final" volumes in W=Integral(PdV)?
Can you figure out what the initial and final volumes are now and how to integrate to get work done by the air in the control mass as it is heated?
 


I understand but I think it's a bit misleading the way the question asked saying "A house has well-insulated walls..." as if the house is "sealed" as you put it. Or it's just me as I immediately thought the air inside is trapped and it's getting hotter and the pressure is rising.

As for the integral, I don't know. I understand due to control mass air is doing a work out and loses energy. But on what boundaries? Would it be correct if we say Vi is 100m3 and Vf is Vf=nRTf/P ??
 


I think what is happening here is that they are considering the house to be 'insulated' but NOT 'sealed'. That is, the air pressure in the house will be the same as the air pressure outside- basically a constant. That means we must either think of the air going out and in as a change in volume or a change in "n", the number of molecules inside the house. It is much easier to just treat the air going outside as still part of the (expanded) "house".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K