Fluid Mechanics: Constant Pressure and Incompressible flow

  • Thread starter olski1
  • Start date
  • #1
15
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Assuming a flow can be idealised as incompressible, then can you use the constant pressure assumption ?

I just want to get my understanding clear. My problem is the following.


Consider a fluid element with volume ##V## and a fixed number of molecules. If the flow is incompressible, then the volume of this element does not change. Right? (otherwise the density would change). Then if the volume does not change, and say you heated it through some process (Joule dissipation, Viscous Dissipation, Conduction etc), then the pressure would have to increase right? So hence, you cannot use the constant pressure assumption and the incompressible assumption at the same time?

The reason I am asking is because I am looking at some MHD temperature equation derivations. There is one step where the substantial derivative ##DP/DT## disappears, where ##P## is the pressure field. There is no reason given, but if it does, then there must be some assumption that the pressure field is atleast approximately constant in both space and time. But how can this be if the fluid is also considered incompressible?

Here is the equations that have confused me

[tex] \rho \frac{Dh}{Dt} = \frac{Dp}{Dt} + \rho \dot{q}_{rad} + \nabla \cdot (k \nabla T) + \frac{1}{\sigma}\mathbf{j}^2+ \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{V}[/tex]

[tex]\rho c_p\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + (\mathbf{V} \cdot \nabla)T\right) = \rho \dot{q}_{rad} + \nabla \cdot (k \nabla T) + \frac{1}{\sigma}\mathbf{j}^2+ \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{V}[/tex]

Note that the LHS is just the definition of enthalpy substituted for ##h=c_pT## and the substantial derivative being expanded.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
20,339
4,303
Thermodynamically, for an incompressible fluid dh = CpdT + vdP = CpdT + dP/ρ

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes olski1
  • #3
15
0
Thermodynamically, for an incompressible fluid dh = CpdT + vdP = CpdT + dP/ρ

Chet
.....and that's the key....thanks Chester, so the book used the wrong formula.
 
  • #4
20,339
4,303
.....and that's the key....thanks Chester, so the book used the wrong formula.
I'm not sure the book used the wrong formula. Did they actually say that dh = Cp dT? Both equations form the book look consistent with the equation I wrote down.

Chet
 
  • #5
15
0
I'm not sure the book used the wrong formula. Did they actually say that dh = Cp dT? Both equations form the book look consistent with the equation I wrote down.

Chet
Yes, the book stated dh=cpdT bizarrely
 
  • #6
20,339
4,303
Yes, the book stated dh=cpdT bizarrely
Go figure. Even the experts make mistakes.

Chet
 

Related Threads on Fluid Mechanics: Constant Pressure and Incompressible flow

Replies
48
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
679
Top